fbpx
Wikipedia

Abbot Scotland v Hamo the Sherrif

'Abbot Scotland v Hamo the Sherrif' or more precisely versus Hamo the Steward, Sheriff of Kent as agent for (or chief tenant of) Bishop Odo of Bayeux, the Earl of Kent (1076) was a determination by William the Conqueror of an English land law suit.

Abbot Scotland v Hamo the Sherrif
Fordwich borough and other lands had been given by the ousted abbot of St Augustine's Abbey (now partly ruined) to the sheriff. The new abbot successfully sued for them back.
CourtThe King as final arbiter
Decided1076
Case history
Prior action(s)An initial decision, unreported
Subsequent action(s)none
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingWilliam the Conqueror
Keywords
Alienation of church property/voidable acts by an outlaw - medieval ecclesiastical patronage - established religion

The matter involved a civil plea (suit) against the donation by a previous abbot of some lands of St Augustine's Abbey, Canterbury and their continued confiscation by William himself. In this case the direct defendant was the land holder (chief tenant) Hamo the Steward, Sheriff of Kent who had been a judge in the case Odo of Bayeux v Lanfranc (1071) five years prior.[1][2][n 1]

The sheriff acted as the king's agent, with his licence, for Odo, the king's brother.[3]

Background edit

The abbey, founded in 598, was given various incremental endowments. King Edward the Confessor in 1055 gave two of the three parts of Fordwich Borough to the Abbey, the third part was confiscated by the sheriff but given to the Abbey (whether before or as a result of this action) having belonged to Earl Godwin of Wessex (who was Edward's wife's father).[4]

The last abbott (Egelsin), very much a Saxon, fled from office in 1070 in some way seen to have joined, or having joined, Archbishop Stigand's resistance to William.[4] Before doing so to gain the favour of the powerful Normans, he granted one, Hamo (also recorded as Hamo de Crevequer, surnamed Vicecomes), several estates, among which Fordwich borough.[2] The King endorsed the confiscation of the land on his flight and replaced him with the Norman or pro-Norman, Scotland.[5] Scotland proved an astute abbot.

Outcome edit

Abbot Scotland recovered for the abbey Plumstead and Fordwich, besides soon or simultaneously obtaining regal grants of the churches of Faversham, Milton and Newington, and various liberties, the King ruling in his favour.[4] He also began the complete rebuilding of the abbey, which was carried on by his successors.[4]

Wider implications edit

The case formed part of a raft of 11th century pleadings against the Normans, whose majority takeover of power, assets and money is recorded by the Domesday Book's 10-year-period account of land ownership. This consolidation saw 64% of land in England pass into the hands of 150 individuals; disgruntled claimants included monastic houses whose abbots had proven unsupportive and surviving Anglo-Saxon nobility.[citation needed] Scotland later died in office in 1087.[4]

See also edit

Notes and references edit

References
  1. ^ "The Domesday Book: England in 1085 genealogy project".
  2. ^ a b Edward Hasted, 'The town and parish of Fordwich', in The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent: Volume 9 Pages 56-67.
  3. ^ Hist. Mon. St. Aug. 352 (abbey of St Augustine, Canterbury).
  4. ^ a b c d e 'Houses of Benedictine monks: The abbey of St Augustine, Canterbury', in A History of the County of Kent: Volume 2, ed. William Page (London, 1926), pp. 126-133. British History Online http://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/kent/vol2/pp126-133 [accessed 23 April 2017].
  5. ^ Thorne, Chron. 1787.
Notes
  1. ^ Hamo became a chief tenant or overlord under the Crown of lands in Kent, Essex and Surrey, per the contemporary work, the Domesday Book

abbot, scotland, hamo, sherrif, more, precisely, versus, hamo, steward, sheriff, kent, agent, chief, tenant, bishop, bayeux, earl, kent, 1076, determination, william, conqueror, english, land, suit, fordwich, borough, other, lands, been, given, ousted, abbot, . Abbot Scotland v Hamo the Sherrif or more precisely versus Hamo the Steward Sheriff of Kent as agent for or chief tenant of Bishop Odo of Bayeux the Earl of Kent 1076 was a determination by William the Conqueror of an English land law suit Abbot Scotland v Hamo the SherrifFordwich borough and other lands had been given by the ousted abbot of St Augustine s Abbey now partly ruined to the sheriff The new abbot successfully sued for them back CourtThe King as final arbiterDecided1076Case historyPrior action s An initial decision unreportedSubsequent action s noneCourt membershipJudge s sittingWilliam the ConquerorKeywordsAlienation of church property voidable acts by an outlaw medieval ecclesiastical patronage established religion The matter involved a civil plea suit against the donation by a previous abbot of some lands of St Augustine s Abbey Canterbury and their continued confiscation by William himself In this case the direct defendant was the land holder chief tenant Hamo the Steward Sheriff of Kent who had been a judge in the case Odo of Bayeux v Lanfranc 1071 five years prior 1 2 n 1 The sheriff acted as the king s agent with his licence for Odo the king s brother 3 Contents 1 Background 2 Outcome 3 Wider implications 4 See also 5 Notes and referencesBackground editThe abbey founded in 598 was given various incremental endowments King Edward the Confessor in 1055 gave two of the three parts of Fordwich Borough to the Abbey the third part was confiscated by the sheriff but given to the Abbey whether before or as a result of this action having belonged to Earl Godwin of Wessex who was Edward s wife s father 4 The last abbott Egelsin very much a Saxon fled from office in 1070 in some way seen to have joined or having joined Archbishop Stigand s resistance to William 4 Before doing so to gain the favour of the powerful Normans he granted one Hamo also recorded as Hamo de Crevequer surnamed Vicecomes several estates among which Fordwich borough 2 The King endorsed the confiscation of the land on his flight and replaced him with the Norman or pro Norman Scotland 5 Scotland proved an astute abbot Outcome editAbbot Scotland recovered for the abbey Plumstead and Fordwich besides soon or simultaneously obtaining regal grants of the churches of Faversham Milton and Newington and various liberties the King ruling in his favour 4 He also began the complete rebuilding of the abbey which was carried on by his successors 4 Wider implications editSee also Feudal system Domesday Book and List of monastic houses in England The case formed part of a raft of 11th century pleadings against the Normans whose majority takeover of power assets and money is recorded by the Domesday Book s 10 year period account of land ownership This consolidation saw 64 of land in England pass into the hands of 150 individuals disgruntled claimants included monastic houses whose abbots had proven unsupportive and surviving Anglo Saxon nobility citation needed Scotland later died in office in 1087 4 See also editOdo of Bayeux v Lanfranc 1071 Bishop Odo v Walter Abbot of Evesham 1077 Bishop Wulstan v Abbot Walter 1077 Notes and references editReferences The Domesday Book England in 1085 genealogy project a b Edward Hasted The town and parish of Fordwich in The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent Volume 9 Pages 56 67 Hist Mon St Aug 352 abbey of St Augustine Canterbury a b c d e Houses of Benedictine monks The abbey of St Augustine Canterbury in A History of the County of Kent Volume 2 ed William Page London 1926 pp 126 133 British History Online http www british history ac uk vch kent vol2 pp126 133 accessed 23 April 2017 Thorne Chron 1787 Notes Hamo became a chief tenant or overlord under the Crown of lands in Kent Essex and Surrey per the contemporary work the Domesday Book Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Abbot Scotland v Hamo the Sherrif amp oldid 1158189380, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.