fbpx
Wikipedia

2020 Colorado Proposition 114

Colorado Proposition 114 (also the Reintroduction and Management of Gray Wolves Proposition, and formerly Initiative #107) was a ballot measure that was approved in Colorado in the November 2020 elections. It was a proposal to reintroduce the gray wolf back into the state. The proposition was passed with a narrow margin, making Colorado the first US state to pass legislation to reintroduce wildlife.[2]

Proposition 114
Reintroduction and Management of Gray Wolves
Results
Choice
Votes %
Yes 1,590,299 50.91%
No 1,533,313 49.09%
Valid votes 3,123,612 94.89%
Invalid or blank votes 168,049 5.11%
Total votes 3,291,661 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 4,211,531 78.16%
Source:Colorado Secretary of State[1]

Background and proposal edit

Gray wolves are native to North America,[3] including Colorado and were once present across the state. Overhunting of common prey (especially elk) and an increase in livestock numbers forced them into conflict with ranchers.[4][5] Wolves were hunted, trapped and poisoned into local extinction by the 1940s.[6]

The Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission rejected a proposal to reintroduce the gray wolf in 2016, citing the potential impact on big game and livestock ranching in the state as well as the fact that the national gray wolf population elsewhere had already exceeded federal conservation goals.[7] Resolutions by the Commission opposing reintroduction had also been passed in 1982 and 1989.[8]

Proposition 114 was instigated through ballot initiative as Initiative #107. Rocky Mountain Wolf Action Fund claimed in December 2019 that they had gathered 211,000 signatures in support of Initiative #107.[9] In January 2020 it was confirmed that the initiative had collected 139,333 valid signatures, above the 124,632 signatures needed to be included in the 2020 elections.[10]

Proposition 114 directs the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission to:[11]

  • Develop plans to begin to reintroduce and manage gray wolves in designated areas in Colorado west of the Continental Divide by December 31, 2023.
  • Hold hearings across the state on scientific, economic and social considerations.
  • Periodically update the plan using public input.
  • Use state funds to help livestock owners adapt to prevent conflict with wolf populations, and to pay fair compensation for livestock losses to gray wolves.

Almost all the potential core wolf habitat is in the west of Colorado, in or to the west of the Southern Rocky Mountains,[12] whereas the state's most populous areas are more to the east.[13] The proposals were estimated to cost between $5 million and $6 million over six years.[14]

Campaign edit

Support edit

The Rocky Mountain Wolf Action Fund led the campaign in support of Proposition 114.[15][16]

It was argued that wolves would "restore Colorado's natural balance", and that reintroduction was needed to counter the effects of the gray wolf's protections under the Endangered Species Act being removed in October 2020.[12][17] Mike Phillips, a wolf biologist, said that having gray wolves in Colorado again would "serve as the archstone" in connecting wolf populations to the north and south.[18]

Endorsements edit

Opposition edit

Stop The Wolf PAC led the campaign against Proposition 114.[16]

It was argued that the proposition would have negative effects on ranchers like past propositions, such as one in the 1990s which banned hunting by trapping, snare or poison.[28][29] Some opponents of the proposition argued that wolves should naturally repopulate the state rather than state agencies interfering.[29]

By October 2020, 39 of Colorado's 64 counties adopted resolutions opposing the measure.[30]

Endorsements edit

Neutral edit

Results edit

Statewide edit

Proposition 114[1]
Choice Votes %
  Yes 1,590,299 50.91
No 1,533,313 49.09
Valid votes 3,123,612 94.89
Invalid or blank votes 168,049 5.11
Total votes 3,291,661 100.00
Registered voters/turnout 4,211,531 78.16

By county edit

County[1][43] Yes votes No votes Yes (%) No (%) Valid votes Turnout (%)
Adams 117,002 107,937 52.01% 47.99% 224,939 75.58%
Alamosa 2,853 4,728 37.63% 62.37% 7,581 72.45%
Arapahoe 178,704 155,486 53.47% 46.53% 334,190 77.07%
Archuleta 3,119 5,638 35.62% 64.38% 8,757 76.82%
Baca 394 1,724 18.60% 81.40% 2,118 75.72%
Bent 743 1,457 33.77% 66.23% 2,200 68.73%
Boulder 132,607 62,955 67.81% 32.19% 195,562 81.68%
Broomfield 24,774 20,147 55.15% 44.85% 44,921 82.49%
Chaffee 5,861 7,439 44.07% 55.93% 13,300 81.29%
Cheyenne 221 891 19.87% 80.13% 1,112 80.25%
Clear Creek 3,162 3,226 49.50% 50.50% 6,388 76.93%
Conejos 1,064 3,079 25.68% 74.32% 4,143 79.07%
Costilla 922 1,004 47.87% 52.13% 1,926 70.69%
Crowley 540 1,156 31.84% 68.16% 1,696 74.93%
Custer 1,160 2,373 32.83% 67.17% 3,533 82.21%
Delta 4,668 14,194 24.75% 75.25% 18,862 81.95%
Denver 249,877 126,776 66.34% 33.66% 376,653 76.24%
Dolores 302 1,119 21.25% 78.75% 1,421 76.40%
Douglas 100,221 121,816 45.14% 54.86% 222,037 84.43%
Eagle 13,067 14,987 46.58% 53.42% 28,054 77.53%
El Paso 185,854 177,977 51.08% 48.92% 363,831 74.15%
Elbert 5,383 13,210 28.95% 71.05% 18,593 84.37%
Fremont 9,308 15,573 37.41% 62.59% 24,881 77.76%
Garfield 11,039 18,974 36.78% 63.22% 30,013 76.73%
Gilpin 1,965 2,167 47.56% 52.44% 4,132 74.96%
Grand 3,424 6,135 35.82% 64.18% 9,559 75.56%
Gunnison 4,676 6,201 42.99% 57.01% 10,877 78.15%
Hinsdale 174 439 28.38% 71.62% 613 80.71%
Huerfano 1,851 2,403 43.51% 56.49% 4,254 76.99%
Jackson 112 747 13.04% 86.96% 859 69.89%
Jefferson 185,173 177,016 51.13% 48.87% 362,189 83.01%
Kiowa 148 726 16.93% 83.07% 874 84.17%
Kit Carson 754 2,984 20.17% 79.83% 3,738 76.53%
La Plata 18,015 16,140 52.74% 47.26% 34,155 73.83%
Lake 1,767 2,063 46.14% 53.86% 3,830 67.75%
Larimer 111,344 104,020 51.70% 48.30% 215,364 80.73%
Las Animas 3,034 4,633 39.57% 60.43% 7,667 69.08%
Lincoln 549 2,024 21.34% 78.66% 2,573 77.65%
Logan 2,686 7,538 26.27% 73.73% 10,224 79.49%
Mesa 26,808 61,004 30.53% 69.47% 87,812 76.85%
Mineral 200 537 27.14% 72.86% 737 81.86%
Moffat 1,147 5,699 16.75% 83.25% 6,846 72.76%
Montezuma 5,529 9,492 36.81% 63.19% 15,021 73.45%
Montrose 5,730 18,414 23.73% 76.27% 24,144 80.65%
Morgan 3,990 9,331 29.95% 70.05% 13,321 75.71%
Otero 3,270 6,054 35.07% 64.93% 9,324 74.22%
Ouray 1,836 2,056 47.17% 52.83% 3,892 82.52%
Park 4,575 7,356 38.35% 61.65% 11,931 76.47%
Phillips 541 1,853 22.60% 77.40% 2,394 73.86%
Pitkin 6,976 4,330 61.70% 38.30% 11,306 79.48%
Prowers 1,473 3,891 27.46% 72.54% 5,364 72.66%
Pueblo 41,430 43,796 48.61% 51.39% 85,226 74.58%
Rio Blanco 439 3,164 12.18% 87.82% 3,603 77.89%
Rio Grande 1,838 4,306 29.92% 70.08% 6,144 74.39%
Routt 6,005 10,297 36.84% 63.16% 16,302 79.33%
Saguache 1,532 1,710 47.25% 52.75% 3,242 72.77%
San Juan 300 231 56.50% 43.50% 531 73.96%
San Miguel 3,140 1,774 63.90% 36.10% 4,914 77.88%
Sedgwick 357 1,027 25.79% 74.21% 1,384 76.81%
Summit 9,593 8,036 54.42% 45.58% 17,629 72.95%
Teller 6,871 9,592 41.74% 58.26% 16,463 77.56%
Washington 497 2,429 16.99% 83.01% 2,926 82.24%
Weld 66,806 93,915 41.57% 58.43% 160,721 77.62%
Yuma 899 3,917 18.67% 81.33% 4,816 81.32%

Aftermath edit

In the 2021 regular session of the Colorado Legislature, HB21-1037 was introduced by Representative Matt Soper and Senators Bob Rankin and Ray Scott. The bill sought to limit the areas where the wolves are reintroduced into to those which voted for Proposition 114 and those which are not home to animals which are the prey of gray wolves and designated by Colorado Parks and Wildlife to be threatened or endangered.[44] A non-partisan analysis from legislative staff commented that the bill "would appear to rule out any reintroduction".[45] The bill failed to progress from the Colorado House Energy and Environment Committee in February 2021.[46]

The first phase of public involvement in reintroduction efforts was undertaken from July to August 2021, including a schedule of over 40 meetings and focus groups.[47]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ a b c "2020 Abstract of Votes Cast" (PDF). Colorado Secretary of State. p. 146. Retrieved December 20, 2021.
  2. ^ Miles Blumhardt (January 10, 2021). "As Colorado prepares to reintroduce wolves, here's how another predator was brought back". The Coloradoan. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  3. ^ (PDF). United States Fish and Wildlife Service. January 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 20, 2022. Retrieved December 28, 2021.
  4. ^ "Colorado Wolves Informational Package" (PDF). Colorado State University. pp. 5–7. Retrieved December 23, 2021.
  5. ^ "Wolves". Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Retrieved December 23, 2021.
  6. ^ "Gray wolf pups spotted in Colorado for the first time since the 1940s". The Independent. Associated Press. June 9, 2021. from the original on June 10, 2021. Retrieved December 23, 2021.
  7. ^ (PDF). Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 21, 2021. Retrieved December 23, 2021.
  8. ^ Arthur Carhart (2017). Gulliford, Andrew; Wolf, Tom (eds.). The Last Stand of the Pack: Critical Edition. University Press of Colorado. p. 226. ISBN 978-1607326939.
  9. ^ Marianne Goodland (January 10, 2019). "Supporters of returning gray wolves to Colorado turn in 211,000 signatures for ballot measure". Colorado Politics. Retrieved December 28, 2021.
  10. ^ Sam Brasch (January 6, 2020). "It's Official: Wolves Are Headed To Colorado's 2020 Ballot". Colorado Public Radio. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  11. ^ "Wolf Management". Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Retrieved December 28, 2021.
  12. ^ a b Douglas Main (November 5, 2020). . National Geographic. Archived from the original on February 27, 2021. Retrieved December 23, 2021.
  13. ^ Arthur Carhart (2017). Gulliford, Andrew; Wolf, Tom (eds.). The Last Stand of the Pack: Critical Edition. University Press of Colorado. p. 227. ISBN 978-1607326939.
  14. ^ Bruce Finley (November 5, 2020). "Voter approval of Colorado wolf reintroduction means "paws on the ground" by late 2023". The Denver Post. Retrieved December 28, 2021.
  15. ^ Sam Moccia (October 26, 2020). . Rocky Mountain Collegian. Archived from the original on December 21, 2021. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  16. ^ a b Jason Blevins (September 24, 2020). "Proposition 114 explained: What's at stake with the effort to reintroduce gray wolves in Colorado". Colorado Sun. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  17. ^ Christine Peterson (October 29, 2020). . National Geographic. Archived from the original on February 22, 2021. Retrieved December 23, 2021.
  18. ^ Amanda Paulson (May 23, 2019). "Call of the wild: Should Colorado bring back the wolf?". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved December 23, 2021.
  19. ^ @Jackson4CO (October 20, 2020). "With 14 days left until Election Day, let's talk Proposition 114. Bringing back grey wolves will reset the order. This is #EnvironmentalJustice. Vote #YesOn114" (Tweet) – via Twitter.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  20. ^ Alicita Rodriguez (October 29, 2019). "Initiative 107 and the case for returning gray wolves to Colorado". UC Denver News. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  21. ^ "Vote Guide 2020". Boulder Weekly. October 8, 2020. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  22. ^ . Colorado Springs Independent. October 14, 2020. Archived from the original on November 3, 2020. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  23. ^ . Colorado Sierra Club. Archived from the original on December 2, 2020. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  24. ^ "Colorado: Vote YES on Prop. 114 to Restore Endangered Gray Wolves". In Defense of Animals. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  25. ^ @OP_Society (October 21, 2020). "As a keystone species, wolves play a crucial ecological role. They regulate populations of other species, helping maintain a balanced ecosystem which allows natural biodiversity to flourish.⁠ Help bring them home to Colorado. VOTE #YesOn114. #HowlYes⁠ Artwork: Creature Conserve" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  26. ^ "Endorsements". Our Revolution. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  27. ^ "Colorado Racial Justice Ballot Guide". Working Families Party. October 14, 2020. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  28. ^ Craig A. Coolahan; Sandy Snider (1998). "Amendment 14-Colorado's Anti-Trapping Initiative, A History And Perspective on Impacts". Proceedings of the Eighteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference. University of Nebraska-Lincoln (38): 131. Retrieved December 23, 2021.
  29. ^ a b Miles Blumhardt (October 31, 2019). "Colorado wolf reintroduction stokes fears, passions of ranchers, ecologists, sportsmen". The Coloradoan. Retrieved December 23, 2021.
  30. ^ a b Jennifer Oldham (October 16, 2020). "Wolves are on the ballot in Colorado". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 28, 2021.
  31. ^ Bob Beauprez (August 30, 2020). "Beauprez: No on Proposition 114; the case against forced wolf introduction". Complete Colorado. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  32. ^ Mark Hillman (October 15, 2020). "OPINION: Mark Hillman's overview of Colorado ballot questions for 2020". Fort Morgan Times. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  33. ^ Joey Bunch (October 19, 2020). "Ted Nugent urges Coloradans to oppose wolf reintroduction". Colorado Politics. Retrieved December 20, 2021.
  34. ^ "ENDORSEMENTS: The Gazette's 2020 election picks". Colorado Springs Gazette. October 11, 2020. Retrieved December 20, 2021.
  35. ^ "EDITORIAL: Our endorsements on the 11 2020 state ballot initiatives". Fort Morgan Times. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  36. ^ "EDITORIAL: Our endorsements on the 11 2020 state ballot initiatives". Journal-Advocate. October 12, 2020. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  37. ^ "Our View: Vote 'no' on Proposition 114, the plan to reintroduce wolves to Colorado". Steamboat Pilot & Today. September 30, 2020. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  38. ^ "EDITORIAL: Colorado's Prop 114 is a political sheep in wolves' clothing — vote no". Sentinel Colorado. September 24, 2020. Retrieved December 28, 2021.
  39. ^ . Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation. November 9, 2020. Archived from the original on December 21, 2021. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  40. ^ "RMEF Commits $300,000 to Defeat Colorado's Proposition 114". Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation. September 25, 2020. Retrieved December 20, 2021.
  41. ^ @SafariClubIntl (November 3, 2020). "Vote NO on Prop 114. Forced wolf introduction will cost at least $6 million but the ballot includes no new funding to pay for wolves, forcing Coloradans to prioritize wolves instead of education, transportation, and existing conservation efforts. #VoteNO #Proposition114" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  42. ^ "2020 Ballot Issues LWVCO Positions". League of Women Voters Colorado. Retrieved December 29, 2021.
  43. ^ "Proposition 114 (STATUTORY)". Colorado Election Results, 2020 General Election. Retrieved December 28, 2021.
  44. ^ "HB21-1037 Limit Designated Lands Gray Wolf Reintroduction". Colorado General Assembly. Retrieved December 20, 2021.
  45. ^ Faith Miller (February 27, 2021). "Gray wolf reintroduction wasn't popular with Western Slope voters. Some lawmakers want guardrails". Colorado Newsline. Retrieved December 20, 2021.
  46. ^ "Roll Call: CO HB1037 – 2021 – Regular Session". LegiScan. Retrieved December 20, 2021.
  47. ^ Keystone Policy Center (June 10, 2021). "Wolf Restoration & Management Plan Public Outreach & Advisory Group Facilitation" (PDF). Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Retrieved December 28, 2021.

External links edit

  • Text of the Proposition

2020, colorado, proposition, colorado, proposition, also, reintroduction, management, gray, wolves, proposition, formerly, initiative, ballot, measure, that, approved, colorado, november, 2020, elections, proposal, reintroduce, gray, wolf, back, into, state, p. Colorado Proposition 114 also the Reintroduction and Management of Gray Wolves Proposition and formerly Initiative 107 was a ballot measure that was approved in Colorado in the November 2020 elections It was a proposal to reintroduce the gray wolf back into the state The proposition was passed with a narrow margin making Colorado the first US state to pass legislation to reintroduce wildlife 2 Proposition 114Reintroduction and Management of Gray WolvesResultsChoice Votes Yes 1 590 299 50 91 No 1 533 313 49 09 Valid votes 3 123 612 94 89 Invalid or blank votes 168 049 5 11 Total votes 3 291 661 100 00 Registered voters turnout 4 211 531 78 16 County resultsPrecinct resultsFor 80 90 70 80 60 70 50 60 Against 90 100 80 90 70 80 60 70 50 60 Other Tie No dataSource Colorado Secretary of State 1 Contents 1 Background and proposal 2 Campaign 2 1 Support 2 1 1 Endorsements 2 2 Opposition 2 2 1 Endorsements 2 3 Neutral 3 Results 3 1 Statewide 3 2 By county 4 Aftermath 5 See also 6 References 7 External linksBackground and proposal editGray wolves are native to North America 3 including Colorado and were once present across the state Overhunting of common prey especially elk and an increase in livestock numbers forced them into conflict with ranchers 4 5 Wolves were hunted trapped and poisoned into local extinction by the 1940s 6 The Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission rejected a proposal to reintroduce the gray wolf in 2016 citing the potential impact on big game and livestock ranching in the state as well as the fact that the national gray wolf population elsewhere had already exceeded federal conservation goals 7 Resolutions by the Commission opposing reintroduction had also been passed in 1982 and 1989 8 Proposition 114 was instigated through ballot initiative as Initiative 107 Rocky Mountain Wolf Action Fund claimed in December 2019 that they had gathered 211 000 signatures in support of Initiative 107 9 In January 2020 it was confirmed that the initiative had collected 139 333 valid signatures above the 124 632 signatures needed to be included in the 2020 elections 10 Proposition 114 directs the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission to 11 Develop plans to begin to reintroduce and manage gray wolves in designated areas in Colorado west of the Continental Divide by December 31 2023 Hold hearings across the state on scientific economic and social considerations Periodically update the plan using public input Use state funds to help livestock owners adapt to prevent conflict with wolf populations and to pay fair compensation for livestock losses to gray wolves Almost all the potential core wolf habitat is in the west of Colorado in or to the west of the Southern Rocky Mountains 12 whereas the state s most populous areas are more to the east 13 The proposals were estimated to cost between 5 million and 6 million over six years 14 Campaign editSupport edit The Rocky Mountain Wolf Action Fund led the campaign in support of Proposition 114 15 16 It was argued that wolves would restore Colorado s natural balance and that reintroduction was needed to counter the effects of the gray wolf s protections under the Endangered Species Act being removed in October 2020 12 17 Mike Phillips a wolf biologist said that having gray wolves in Colorado again would serve as the archstone in connecting wolf populations to the north and south 18 Endorsements edit Yes IndividualsDominique Jackson member of the Colorado House of Representatives for District 42 19 Leilani Munter environmental activist and former racing driver Mike Phillips member of the Montana Senate and wolf biologist 20 NewspapersBoulder Weekly 21 Colorado Springs Independent 22 OrganisationsColorado Sierra Club 23 In Defense of Animals 24 Oceanic Preservation Society 25 Our Revolution 26 Working Families Party 27 Opposition edit Stop The Wolf PAC led the campaign against Proposition 114 16 It was argued that the proposition would have negative effects on ranchers like past propositions such as one in the 1990s which banned hunting by trapping snare or poison 28 29 Some opponents of the proposition argued that wolves should naturally repopulate the state rather than state agencies interfering 29 By October 2020 39 of Colorado s 64 counties adopted resolutions opposing the measure 30 Endorsements edit No IndividualsBob Beauprez former member of the U S House of Representatives for Colorado s 7th district 2003 2007 31 Ted Harvey former member of the Colorado Senate 2007 2015 and the Colorado House of Representatives 2001 2006 30 Mark Hillman former State Senator 1998 2005 and former Colorado State Treasurer 2005 2006 32 Ted Nugent singer songwriter 33 NewspapersColorado Springs Gazette 34 Fort Morgan Times 35 Journal Advocate 36 Steamboat Pilot amp Today 37 Sentinel Colorado 38 OrganisationsCongressional Sportsmen s Foundation 39 Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation 40 Safari Club International 41 Neutral edit NeutralLeague of Women Voters Colorado 42 Results editStatewide edit Proposition 114 1 Choice Votes nbsp Yes 1 590 299 50 91No 1 533 313 49 09Valid votes 3 123 612 94 89Invalid or blank votes 168 049 5 11Total votes 3 291 661 100 00Registered voters turnout 4 211 531 78 16By county edit County 1 43 Yes votes No votes Yes No Valid votes Turnout Adams 117 002 107 937 52 01 47 99 224 939 75 58 Alamosa 2 853 4 728 37 63 62 37 7 581 72 45 Arapahoe 178 704 155 486 53 47 46 53 334 190 77 07 Archuleta 3 119 5 638 35 62 64 38 8 757 76 82 Baca 394 1 724 18 60 81 40 2 118 75 72 Bent 743 1 457 33 77 66 23 2 200 68 73 Boulder 132 607 62 955 67 81 32 19 195 562 81 68 Broomfield 24 774 20 147 55 15 44 85 44 921 82 49 Chaffee 5 861 7 439 44 07 55 93 13 300 81 29 Cheyenne 221 891 19 87 80 13 1 112 80 25 Clear Creek 3 162 3 226 49 50 50 50 6 388 76 93 Conejos 1 064 3 079 25 68 74 32 4 143 79 07 Costilla 922 1 004 47 87 52 13 1 926 70 69 Crowley 540 1 156 31 84 68 16 1 696 74 93 Custer 1 160 2 373 32 83 67 17 3 533 82 21 Delta 4 668 14 194 24 75 75 25 18 862 81 95 Denver 249 877 126 776 66 34 33 66 376 653 76 24 Dolores 302 1 119 21 25 78 75 1 421 76 40 Douglas 100 221 121 816 45 14 54 86 222 037 84 43 Eagle 13 067 14 987 46 58 53 42 28 054 77 53 El Paso 185 854 177 977 51 08 48 92 363 831 74 15 Elbert 5 383 13 210 28 95 71 05 18 593 84 37 Fremont 9 308 15 573 37 41 62 59 24 881 77 76 Garfield 11 039 18 974 36 78 63 22 30 013 76 73 Gilpin 1 965 2 167 47 56 52 44 4 132 74 96 Grand 3 424 6 135 35 82 64 18 9 559 75 56 Gunnison 4 676 6 201 42 99 57 01 10 877 78 15 Hinsdale 174 439 28 38 71 62 613 80 71 Huerfano 1 851 2 403 43 51 56 49 4 254 76 99 Jackson 112 747 13 04 86 96 859 69 89 Jefferson 185 173 177 016 51 13 48 87 362 189 83 01 Kiowa 148 726 16 93 83 07 874 84 17 Kit Carson 754 2 984 20 17 79 83 3 738 76 53 La Plata 18 015 16 140 52 74 47 26 34 155 73 83 Lake 1 767 2 063 46 14 53 86 3 830 67 75 Larimer 111 344 104 020 51 70 48 30 215 364 80 73 Las Animas 3 034 4 633 39 57 60 43 7 667 69 08 Lincoln 549 2 024 21 34 78 66 2 573 77 65 Logan 2 686 7 538 26 27 73 73 10 224 79 49 Mesa 26 808 61 004 30 53 69 47 87 812 76 85 Mineral 200 537 27 14 72 86 737 81 86 Moffat 1 147 5 699 16 75 83 25 6 846 72 76 Montezuma 5 529 9 492 36 81 63 19 15 021 73 45 Montrose 5 730 18 414 23 73 76 27 24 144 80 65 Morgan 3 990 9 331 29 95 70 05 13 321 75 71 Otero 3 270 6 054 35 07 64 93 9 324 74 22 Ouray 1 836 2 056 47 17 52 83 3 892 82 52 Park 4 575 7 356 38 35 61 65 11 931 76 47 Phillips 541 1 853 22 60 77 40 2 394 73 86 Pitkin 6 976 4 330 61 70 38 30 11 306 79 48 Prowers 1 473 3 891 27 46 72 54 5 364 72 66 Pueblo 41 430 43 796 48 61 51 39 85 226 74 58 Rio Blanco 439 3 164 12 18 87 82 3 603 77 89 Rio Grande 1 838 4 306 29 92 70 08 6 144 74 39 Routt 6 005 10 297 36 84 63 16 16 302 79 33 Saguache 1 532 1 710 47 25 52 75 3 242 72 77 San Juan 300 231 56 50 43 50 531 73 96 San Miguel 3 140 1 774 63 90 36 10 4 914 77 88 Sedgwick 357 1 027 25 79 74 21 1 384 76 81 Summit 9 593 8 036 54 42 45 58 17 629 72 95 Teller 6 871 9 592 41 74 58 26 16 463 77 56 Washington 497 2 429 16 99 83 01 2 926 82 24 Weld 66 806 93 915 41 57 58 43 160 721 77 62 Yuma 899 3 917 18 67 81 33 4 816 81 32 Aftermath editSee also Repopulation of wolves in Colorado In the 2021 regular session of the Colorado Legislature HB21 1037 was introduced by Representative Matt Soper and Senators Bob Rankin and Ray Scott The bill sought to limit the areas where the wolves are reintroduced into to those which voted for Proposition 114 and those which are not home to animals which are the prey of gray wolves and designated by Colorado Parks and Wildlife to be threatened or endangered 44 A non partisan analysis from legislative staff commented that the bill would appear to rule out any reintroduction 45 The bill failed to progress from the Colorado House Energy and Environment Committee in February 2021 46 The first phase of public involvement in reintroduction efforts was undertaken from July to August 2021 including a schedule of over 40 meetings and focus groups 47 See also edit nbsp Politics portal nbsp Colorado portalList of Colorado ballot measuresReferences edit a b c 2020 Abstract of Votes Cast PDF Colorado Secretary of State p 146 Retrieved December 20 2021 Miles Blumhardt January 10 2021 As Colorado prepares to reintroduce wolves here s how another predator was brought back The Coloradoan Retrieved December 21 2021 Wolf Recovery in North America PDF United States Fish and Wildlife Service January 2007 Archived from the original PDF on January 20 2022 Retrieved December 28 2021 Colorado Wolves Informational Package PDF Colorado State University pp 5 7 Retrieved December 23 2021 Wolves Colorado Parks and Wildlife Retrieved December 23 2021 Gray wolf pups spotted in Colorado for the first time since the 1940s The Independent Associated Press June 9 2021 Archived from the original on June 10 2021 Retrieved December 23 2021 Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission Resolution 16 01 regarding introduction re introduction of wolves PDF Colorado Parks and Wildlife Archived from the original PDF on December 21 2021 Retrieved December 23 2021 Arthur Carhart 2017 Gulliford Andrew Wolf Tom eds The Last Stand of the Pack Critical Edition University Press of Colorado p 226 ISBN 978 1607326939 Marianne Goodland January 10 2019 Supporters of returning gray wolves to Colorado turn in 211 000 signatures for ballot measure Colorado Politics Retrieved December 28 2021 Sam Brasch January 6 2020 It s Official Wolves Are Headed To Colorado s 2020 Ballot Colorado Public Radio Retrieved December 21 2021 Wolf Management Colorado Parks and Wildlife Retrieved December 28 2021 a b Douglas Main November 5 2020 Gray wolves to be reintroduced to Colorado in unprecedented vote National Geographic Archived from the original on February 27 2021 Retrieved December 23 2021 Arthur Carhart 2017 Gulliford Andrew Wolf Tom eds The Last Stand of the Pack Critical Edition University Press of Colorado p 227 ISBN 978 1607326939 Bruce Finley November 5 2020 Voter approval of Colorado wolf reintroduction means paws on the ground by late 2023 The Denver Post Retrieved December 28 2021 Sam Moccia October 26 2020 Ballot feature Proposition 114 Rocky Mountain Collegian Archived from the original on December 21 2021 Retrieved December 21 2021 a b Jason Blevins September 24 2020 Proposition 114 explained What s at stake with the effort to reintroduce gray wolves in Colorado Colorado Sun Retrieved December 21 2021 Christine Peterson October 29 2020 Gray wolves taken off U S endangered species list in controversial move National Geographic Archived from the original on February 22 2021 Retrieved December 23 2021 Amanda Paulson May 23 2019 Call of the wild Should Colorado bring back the wolf The Christian Science Monitor Retrieved December 23 2021 Jackson4CO October 20 2020 With 14 days left until Election Day let s talk Proposition 114 Bringing back grey wolves will reset the order This is EnvironmentalJustice Vote YesOn114 Tweet via Twitter a href Template Cite web html title Template Cite web cite web a CS1 maint numeric names authors list link Alicita Rodriguez October 29 2019 Initiative 107 and the case for returning gray wolves to Colorado UC Denver News Retrieved December 21 2021 Vote Guide 2020 Boulder Weekly October 8 2020 Retrieved December 21 2021 Election 2020 Indy Endorsement Cheat Sheet Colorado Springs Independent October 14 2020 Archived from the original on November 3 2020 Retrieved December 21 2021 2020 ENDORSED CANDIDATES Colorado Sierra Club Archived from the original on December 2 2020 Retrieved December 21 2021 Colorado Vote YES on Prop 114 to Restore Endangered Gray Wolves In Defense of Animals Retrieved December 21 2021 OP Society October 21 2020 As a keystone species wolves play a crucial ecological role They regulate populations of other species helping maintain a balanced ecosystem which allows natural biodiversity to flourish Help bring them home to Colorado VOTE YesOn114 HowlYes Artwork Creature Conserve Tweet via Twitter Endorsements Our Revolution Retrieved December 21 2021 Colorado Racial Justice Ballot Guide Working Families Party October 14 2020 Retrieved December 21 2021 Craig A Coolahan Sandy Snider 1998 Amendment 14 Colorado s Anti Trapping Initiative A History And Perspective on Impacts Proceedings of the Eighteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference University of Nebraska Lincoln 38 131 Retrieved December 23 2021 a b Miles Blumhardt October 31 2019 Colorado wolf reintroduction stokes fears passions of ranchers ecologists sportsmen The Coloradoan Retrieved December 23 2021 a b Jennifer Oldham October 16 2020 Wolves are on the ballot in Colorado The Washington Post Retrieved December 28 2021 Bob Beauprez August 30 2020 Beauprez No on Proposition 114 the case against forced wolf introduction Complete Colorado Retrieved December 21 2021 Mark Hillman October 15 2020 OPINION Mark Hillman s overview of Colorado ballot questions for 2020 Fort Morgan Times Retrieved December 21 2021 Joey Bunch October 19 2020 Ted Nugent urges Coloradans to oppose wolf reintroduction Colorado Politics Retrieved December 20 2021 ENDORSEMENTS The Gazette s 2020 election picks Colorado Springs Gazette October 11 2020 Retrieved December 20 2021 EDITORIAL Our endorsements on the 11 2020 state ballot initiatives Fort Morgan Times Retrieved December 21 2021 EDITORIAL Our endorsements on the 11 2020 state ballot initiatives Journal Advocate October 12 2020 Retrieved December 21 2021 Our View Vote no on Proposition 114 the plan to reintroduce wolves to Colorado Steamboat Pilot amp Today September 30 2020 Retrieved December 21 2021 EDITORIAL Colorado s Prop 114 is a political sheep in wolves clothing vote no Sentinel Colorado September 24 2020 Retrieved December 28 2021 Hunting Management Decisions Left to Voters in the West Congressional Sportsmen s Foundation November 9 2020 Archived from the original on December 21 2021 Retrieved December 21 2021 RMEF Commits 300 000 to Defeat Colorado s Proposition 114 Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation September 25 2020 Retrieved December 20 2021 SafariClubIntl November 3 2020 Vote NO on Prop 114 Forced wolf introduction will cost at least 6 million but the ballot includes no new funding to pay for wolves forcing Coloradans to prioritize wolves instead of education transportation and existing conservation efforts VoteNO Proposition114 Tweet via Twitter 2020 Ballot Issues LWVCO Positions League of Women Voters Colorado Retrieved December 29 2021 Proposition 114 STATUTORY Colorado Election Results 2020 General Election Retrieved December 28 2021 HB21 1037 Limit Designated Lands Gray Wolf Reintroduction Colorado General Assembly Retrieved December 20 2021 Faith Miller February 27 2021 Gray wolf reintroduction wasn t popular with Western Slope voters Some lawmakers want guardrails Colorado Newsline Retrieved December 20 2021 Roll Call CO HB1037 2021 Regular Session LegiScan Retrieved December 20 2021 Keystone Policy Center June 10 2021 Wolf Restoration amp Management Plan Public Outreach amp Advisory Group Facilitation PDF Colorado Parks and Wildlife Retrieved December 28 2021 External links editText of the Proposition Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title 2020 Colorado Proposition 114 amp oldid 1186293209, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.