fbpx
Wikipedia

Paleoanthropology

Paleoanthropology or paleo-anthropology is a branch of paleontology and anthropology which seeks to understand the early development of anatomically modern humans, a process known as hominization, through the reconstruction of evolutionary kinship lines within the family Hominidae, working from biological evidence (such as petrified skeletal remains, bone fragments, footprints) and cultural evidence (such as stone tools, artifacts, and settlement localities).[1][2]

The field draws from and combines primatology, paleontology, biological anthropology, and cultural anthropology. As technologies and methods advance, genetics plays an ever-increasing role, in particular to examine and compare DNA structure as a vital tool of research of the evolutionary kinship lines of related species and genera.

Etymology edit

The term paleoanthropology derives from Greek palaiós (παλαιός) "old, ancient", ánthrōpos (ἄνθρωπος) "man, human" and the suffix -logía (-λογία) "study of".

Hominoid taxonomies edit

Hominoids are a primate superfamily, the hominid family is currently considered to comprise both the great ape lineages and human lineages within the hominoid superfamily. The "Homininae" comprise both the human lineages and the African ape lineages. The term "African apes" refers only to chimpanzees and gorillas.[3] The terminology of the immediate biological family is currently in flux. The term "hominin" refers to any genus in the human tribe (Hominini), of which Homo sapiens (modern humans) is the only living specimen.[4][5]

History edit

18th century edit

In 1758 Carl Linnaeus introduced the name Homo sapiens as a species name in the 10th edition of his work Systema Naturae although without a scientific description of the species-specific characteristics.[6] Since the great apes were considered the closest relatives of human beings, based on morphological similarity, in the 19th century, it was speculated that the closest living relatives to humans were chimpanzees (genus Pan) and gorilla (genus Gorilla), and based on the natural range of these creatures, it was surmised that humans shared a common ancestor with African apes and that fossils of these ancestors would ultimately be found in Africa.[6][7]

19th century edit

 
Charles Darwin

The science arguably began in the late 19th century when important discoveries occurred that led to the study of human evolution. The discovery of the Neanderthal in Germany, Thomas Huxley's Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature, and Charles Darwin's The Descent of Man were both important to early paleoanthropological research.

The modern field of paleoanthropology began in the 19th century with the discovery of "Neanderthal man" (the eponymous skeleton was found in 1856, but there had been finds elsewhere since 1830), and with evidence of so-called cave men. The idea that humans are similar to certain great apes had been obvious to people for some time, but the idea of the biological evolution of species in general was not legitimized until after Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859.

Though Darwin's first book on evolution did not address the specific question of human evolution—"light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history," was all Darwin wrote on the subject—the implications of evolutionary theory were clear to contemporary readers.

Debates between Thomas Huxley and Richard Owen focused on the idea of human evolution. Huxley convincingly illustrated many of the similarities and differences between humans and apes in his 1863 book Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature. By the time Darwin published his own book on the subject, Descent of Man, it was already a well-known interpretation of his theory—and the interpretation which made the theory highly controversial. Even many of Darwin's original supporters (such as Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Lyell) balked at the idea that human beings could have evolved their apparently boundless mental capacities and moral sensibilities through natural selection.

Asia edit

 
Five of the seven known fossil teeth of Homo luzonensis found in Callao Cave, the Philippines.

Prior to the general acceptance of Africa as the root of genus Homo, 19th-century naturalists sought the origin of humans in Asia. So-called "dragon bones" (fossil bones and teeth) from Chinese apothecary shops were known, but it was not until the early 20th century that German paleontologist, Max Schlosser, first described a single human tooth from Beijing. Although Schlosser (1903) was very cautious, identifying the tooth only as "?Anthropoide g. et sp. indet?," he was hopeful that future work would discover a new anthropoid in China.

Eleven years later, the Swedish geologist Johan Gunnar Andersson was sent to China as a mining advisor and soon developed an interest in "dragon bones". It was he who, in 1918, discovered the sites around Zhoukoudian, a village about 50 kilometers southwest of Beijing. However, because of the sparse nature of the initial finds, the site was abandoned.

Work did not resume until 1921, when the Austrian paleontologist, Otto Zdansky, fresh with his doctoral degree from Vienna, came to Beijing to work for Andersson. Zdansky conducted short-term excavations at Locality 1 in 1921 and 1923, and recovered only two teeth of significance (one premolar and one molar) that he subsequently described, cautiously, as "?Homo sp." (Zdansky, 1927). With that done, Zdansky returned to Austria and suspended all fieldwork.

News of the fossil hominin teeth delighted the scientific community in Beijing, and plans for developing a larger, more systematic project at Zhoukoudian were soon formulated. At the epicenter of excitement was Davidson Black, a Canadian-born anatomist working at Peking Union Medical College. Black shared Andersson’s interest, as well as his view that central Asia was a promising home for early humankind. In late 1926, Black submitted a proposal to the Rockefeller Foundation seeking financial support for systematic excavation at Zhoukoudian and the establishment of an institute for the study of human biology in China.

The Zhoukoudian Project came into existence in the spring of 1927, and two years later, the Cenozoic Research Laboratory of the Geological Survey of China was formally established. Being the first institution of its kind, the Cenozoic Laboratory opened up new avenues for the study of paleogeology and paleontology in China. The Laboratory was the precursor of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (IVPP) of the Chinese Academy of Science, which took its modern form after 1949.

The first of the major project finds are attributed to the young Swedish paleontologist, Anders Birger Bohlin, then serving as the field advisor at Zhoukoudian. He recovered a left lower molar that Black (1927) identified as unmistakably human (it compared favorably to the previous find made by Zdansky), and subsequently coined it Sinanthropus pekinensis.[8] The news was at first met with skepticism, and many scholars had reservations that a single tooth was sufficient to justify the naming of a new type of early hominin. Yet within a little more than two years, in the winter of 1929, Pei Wenzhong, then the field director at Zhoukoudian, unearthed the first complete calvaria of Peking Man. Twenty-seven years after Schlosser’s initial description, the antiquity of early humans in East Asia was no longer a speculation, but a reality.

 
The Zhoukoudian site

Excavations continued at the site and remained fruitful until the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937. The decade-long research yielded a wealth of faunal and lithic materials, as well as hominin fossils. These included 5 more complete calvaria, 9 large cranial fragments, 6 facial fragments, 14 partial mandibles, 147 isolated teeth, and 11 postcranial elements—estimated to represent as least 40 individuals. Evidence of fire, marked by ash lenses and burned bones and stones, were apparently also present,[9] although recent studies have challenged this view.[10] Franz Weidenreich came to Beijing soon after Black’s untimely death in 1934, and took charge of the study of the hominin specimens.

Following the loss of the Peking Man materials in late 1941, scientific endeavors at Zhoukoudian slowed, primarily because of lack of funding. Frantic search for the missing fossils took place, and continued well into the 1950s. After the establishment of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, excavations resumed at Zhoukoudian. But with political instability and social unrest brewing in China, beginning in 1966, and major discoveries at Olduvai Gorge and East Turkana (Koobi Fora), the paleoanthropological spotlight shifted westward to East Africa. Although China re-opened its doors to the West in the late 1970s, national policy calling for self-reliance, coupled with a widened language barrier, thwarted all the possibilities of renewed scientific relationships. Indeed, Harvard anthropologist K. C. Chang noted, "international collaboration (in developing nations very often a disguise for Western domination) became a thing of the past" (1977: 139).

Africa edit

 
Skull of Australopithecus africanus

1920s – 1940s edit

The first paleoanthropological find made in Africa was the 1921 discovery of the Kabwe 1 skull at Kabwe (Broken Hill), Zambia. Initially, this specimen was named Homo rhodesiensis; however, today it is considered part of the species Homo heidelbergensis.[11]

In 1924 in a limestone quarry at Taung, Professor Raymond Dart discovered a remarkably well-preserved juvenile specimen (face and brain endocast), which he named Australopithecus africanus (Australopithecus meaning "Southern Ape"). Although the brain was small (410 cm³), its shape was rounded, unlike the brain shape of chimpanzees and gorillas, and more like the shape seen in modern humans. In addition, the specimen exhibited short canine teeth, and the anterior placement of the foramen magnum was more like the placement seen in modern humans than the placement seen in chimpanzees and gorillas, suggesting that this species was bipedal.

All of these traits convinced Dart that the Taung child was a bipedal human ancestor, a transitional form between ape and human. However, Dart's conclusions were largely ignored for decades, as the prevailing view of the time was that a large brain evolved before bipedality. It took the discovery of additional australopith fossils in Africa that resembled his specimen, and the rejection of the Piltdown Man hoax, for Dart's claims to be taken seriously.

In the 1930s, paleontologist Robert Broom discovered and described a new species at Kromdraai, South Africa. Although similar in some ways to Dart's Australopithecus africanus, Broom's specimen had much larger cheek teeth. Because of this difference, Broom named his specimen Paranthropus robustus, using a new genus name. In doing so, he established the practice of grouping gracile australopiths in the genus Australopithecus and robust australopiths in the genus Paranthropus. During the 1960s, the robust variety was commonly moved into Australopithecus. A more recent consensus has been to return to the original classification of Paranthropus as a separate genus.[12]

1950s – 1990s edit

The second half of the twentieth century saw a significant increase in the number of paleoanthropological finds made in Africa. Many of these finds were associated with the work of the Leakey family in eastern Africa. In 1959, Mary Leakey's discovery of the Zinj fossin (OH 5) at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, led to the identification of a new species, Paranthropus boisei.[13] In 1960, the Leakeys discovered the fossil OH 7, also at Olduvai Gorge, and assigned it to a new species, Homo habilis. In 1972, Bernard Ngeneo, a fieldworker working for Richard Leakey, discovered the fossil KNM-ER 1470 near Lake Turkana in Kenya. KNM-ER 1470 has been interpreted as either a distinct species, Homo rudolfensis, or alternatively as evidence of sexual dimorphism in Homo habilis.[12] In 1967, Richard Leakey reported the earliest definitive examples of anatomically modern Homo sapiens from the site of Omo Kibish in Ethiopia, known as the Omo remains.[14] In the late 1970s, Mary Leakey excavated the famous Laetoli footprints in Tanzania, which demonstrated the antiquity of bipedality in the human lineage.[12] In 1985, Richard Leakey and Alan Walker discovered a specimen they called the Black Skull, found near Lake Turkana. This specimen was assigned to another species, Paranthropus aethiopicus.[15] In 1994, a team led by Meave Leakey announced a new species, Australopithecus anamensis, based on specimens found near Lake Turkana.[12]

Numerous other researchers have made important discoveries in eastern Africa. Possibly the most famous is the Lucy skeleton, discovered in 1973 by Donald Johanson and Maurice Taieb in Ethiopia's Afar Triangle at the site of Hadar. On the basis of this skeleton and subsequent discoveries, the researchers came up with a new species, Australopithecus afarensis.[12] In 1975, Colin Groves and Vratislav Mazák announced a new species of human they called Homo ergaster. Homo ergaster specimens have been found at numerous sites in eastern and southern Africa.[12] In 1994, Tim D. White announced a new species, Ardipithecus ramidus, based on fossils from Ethiopia.[16]

In 1999, two new species were announced. Berhane Asfaw and Tim D. White named Australopithecus garhi based on specimens discovered in Ethiopia's Awash valley. Meave Leakey announced a new species, Kenyanthropus platyops, based on the cranium KNM-WT 40000 from Lake Turkana.[12]

21st century edit

 
Fossil hominid skull display at The Museum of Osteology in Oklahoma City, USA

In the 21st century, numerous fossils have been found that add to current knowledge of existing species. For example, in 2001, Zeresenay Alemseged discovered an Australopithecus afarensis child fossil, called Selam, from the site of Dikika in the Afar region of Ethiopia. This find is particularly important because the fossil included a preserved hyoid bone, something rarely found in other paleoanthropological fossils but important for understanding the evolution of speech capacities.[11][12]

Two new species from southern Africa have been discovered and described in recent years. In 2008, a team led by Lee Berger announced a new species, Australopithecus sediba, based on fossils they had discovered in Malapa cave in South Africa.[12] In 2015, a team also led by Lee Berger announced another species, Homo naledi, based on fossils representing 15 individuals from the Rising Star Cave system in South Africa.[17]

New species have also been found in eastern Africa. In 2000, Brigitte Senut and Martin Pickford described the species Orrorin tugenensis, based on fossils they found in Kenya. In 2004, Yohannes Haile-Selassie announced that some specimens previously labeled as Ardipithecus ramidus made up a different species, Ardipithecus kadabba.[12] In 2015, Haile-Selassie announced another new species, Australopithecus deyiremeda, though some scholars are skeptical that the associated fossils truly represent a unique species.[18]

Although most hominin fossils from Africa have been found in eastern and southern Africa, there are a few exceptions. One is Sahelanthropus tchadensis, discovered in the central African country of Chad in 2002. This find is important because it widens the assumed geographic range of early hominins.[12]

Renowned paleoanthropologists edit

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ . Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on December 12, 2013. Retrieved October 1, 2015.
  2. ^ "paleoanthropology". Dictionary com LLC. from the original on March 8, 2016. Retrieved October 1, 2015.
  3. ^ "Hominoid taxonomies August 1, 2001 Science Week". University of California Los Angeles. from the original on October 23, 2018. Retrieved October 2, 2015.
  4. ^ "Paleoanthropology Hominid Family History". Communication Studies, University of California, Los Angeles. from the original on October 17, 2018. Retrieved October 2, 2015.
  5. ^ "Fossil Hominids The Evidence for Human Evolution". Jim Foley. from the original on June 3, 2019. Retrieved October 2, 2015.
  6. ^ a b Caroli Linnæi Systema naturæ. Biodiversity Heritage Library. 1894. from the original on November 8, 2012. Retrieved September 27, 2015.
  7. ^ Kerry Bright, sponsored by the National Science Foundation at the University of Montana. . Evolution Education website, evoled.org. Archived from the original on 2003-12-26.
  8. ^ Rukang, Wu; Olsen, John W. (2009-09-15). PALEOANTHROPOLOGY AND PALEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGY IN THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA by Wu Rukang, John W Olsen. Left Coast Press. ISBN 9781598744583. from the original on 2023-10-27. Retrieved December 26, 2015.
  9. ^ Black, 1931[page needed][full citation needed]
  10. ^ Weiner et al., 1998[page needed][full citation needed]
  11. ^ a b Cartmill, M.; Smith, F. H. (2009). The Human Lineage (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Boyd, R.; Silk, J.B. (2014). How Humans Evolved. WW Norton & Company.
  13. ^ Leakey, L. S. B. (August 1959). "A New Fossil Skull From Olduvai". Nature. 184 (4685): 491–493. Bibcode:1959Natur.184..491L. doi:10.1038/184491a0. ISSN 1476-4687. S2CID 4217460. from the original on 2020-09-14. Retrieved 2020-12-21.
  14. ^ Leakey, R. E. F. (June 1969). "Early Homo sapiens Remains from the Omo River Region of South-west Ethiopia: Faunal Remains from the Omo Valley". Nature. 222 (5199): 1132–1133. Bibcode:1969Natur.222.1132L. doi:10.1038/2221132a0. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 5788977. S2CID 4186101. from the original on 2021-05-25. Retrieved 2020-12-21.
  15. ^ Walker, A.; Leakey, R. E.; Harris, J. M.; Brown, F. H. (August 1986). "2.5-Myr Australopithecus boisei from west of Lake Turkana, Kenya". Nature. 322 (6079): 517–522. Bibcode:1986Natur.322..517W. doi:10.1038/322517a0. ISSN 0028-0836. S2CID 4270200. from the original on 2021-06-10. Retrieved 2020-12-21.
  16. ^ White, Tim D.; Suwa, Gen; Asfaw, Berhane (1994-09-22). "Australopithecus ramidus, a new species of early hominid from Aramis, Ethiopia". Nature. 371 (6495): 306–312. Bibcode:1994Natur.371..306W. doi:10.1038/371306a0. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 8090200. S2CID 4347140. from the original on 2020-11-15. Retrieved 2020-12-21.
  17. ^ Berger, Lee (2015). "Homo naledi, a new species of the genus Homo from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa". eLife. 4. doi:10.7554/eLife.09560.001.
  18. ^ Haile-Selassie, Yohannes; Gibert, Luis; Melillo, Stephanie M.; Ryan, Timothy M.; Alene, Mulugeta; Deino, Alan; Levin, Naomi E.; Scott, Gary; Saylor, Beverly Z. (May 2015). "New species from Ethiopia further expands Middle Pliocene hominin diversity". Nature. 521 (7553): 483–488. Bibcode:2015Natur.521..483H. doi:10.1038/nature14448. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 26017448. S2CID 4455029. from the original on 2021-02-14. Retrieved 2020-12-21.

Further reading edit

  • David R. Begun, A Companion to Paleoanthropology, Malden, Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.
  • Winfried Henke, Ian Tattersall (eds.), Handbook of Paleoanthropology, Dordrecht, Springer, 2007.

External links edit

  • Paleoanthropology in the 1990s – Essays by James Q. Jacobs.
  • Fossil Hominids
  • Aspects of Paleoanthropology
  • Becoming Human: Paleoanthropology, Evolution and Human Origins
  • Department of Human Evolution ~ Max Planck Institute, Leipzig
  • Human Timeline (Interactive) – Smithsonian, National Museum of Natural History (August 2016).

paleoanthropology, paleo, anthropology, branch, paleontology, anthropology, which, seeks, understand, early, development, anatomically, modern, humans, process, known, hominization, through, reconstruction, evolutionary, kinship, lines, within, family, hominid. Paleoanthropology or paleo anthropology is a branch of paleontology and anthropology which seeks to understand the early development of anatomically modern humans a process known as hominization through the reconstruction of evolutionary kinship lines within the family Hominidae working from biological evidence such as petrified skeletal remains bone fragments footprints and cultural evidence such as stone tools artifacts and settlement localities 1 2 The field draws from and combines primatology paleontology biological anthropology and cultural anthropology As technologies and methods advance genetics plays an ever increasing role in particular to examine and compare DNA structure as a vital tool of research of the evolutionary kinship lines of related species and genera Contents 1 Etymology 2 Hominoid taxonomies 3 History 3 1 18th century 3 2 19th century 3 3 Asia 3 4 Africa 3 4 1 1920s 1940s 3 4 2 1950s 1990s 3 4 3 21st century 4 Renowned paleoanthropologists 5 See also 6 References 7 Further reading 8 External linksEtymology editThe term paleoanthropology derives from Greek palaios palaios old ancient anthrōpos ἄn8rwpos man human and the suffix logia logia study of Hominoid taxonomies editHominoids are a primate superfamily the hominid family is currently considered to comprise both the great ape lineages and human lineages within the hominoid superfamily The Homininae comprise both the human lineages and the African ape lineages The term African apes refers only to chimpanzees and gorillas 3 The terminology of the immediate biological family is currently in flux The term hominin refers to any genus in the human tribe Hominini of which Homo sapiens modern humans is the only living specimen 4 5 Suborder HominoidsFamily HominidsSubfamily HomininaeTribe GorilliniTribe HomininiGenus ArdipithecusGenus AustralopithecusGenus ParanthropusGenus KenyanthropusGenus HomoHistory edit18th century edit In 1758 Carl Linnaeus introduced the name Homo sapiens as a species name in the 10th edition of his work Systema Naturae although without a scientific description of the species specific characteristics 6 Since the great apes were considered the closest relatives of human beings based on morphological similarity in the 19th century it was speculated that the closest living relatives to humans were chimpanzees genus Pan and gorilla genus Gorilla and based on the natural range of these creatures it was surmised that humans shared a common ancestor with African apes and that fossils of these ancestors would ultimately be found in Africa 6 7 19th century edit nbsp Charles DarwinThe science arguably began in the late 19th century when important discoveries occurred that led to the study of human evolution The discovery of the Neanderthal in Germany Thomas Huxley s Evidence as to Man s Place in Nature and Charles Darwin s The Descent of Man were both important to early paleoanthropological research The modern field of paleoanthropology began in the 19th century with the discovery of Neanderthal man the eponymous skeleton was found in 1856 but there had been finds elsewhere since 1830 and with evidence of so called cave men The idea that humans are similar to certain great apes had been obvious to people for some time but the idea of the biological evolution of species in general was not legitimized until after Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859 Though Darwin s first book on evolution did not address the specific question of human evolution light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history was all Darwin wrote on the subject the implications of evolutionary theory were clear to contemporary readers Debates between Thomas Huxley and Richard Owen focused on the idea of human evolution Huxley convincingly illustrated many of the similarities and differences between humans and apes in his 1863 book Evidence as to Man s Place in Nature By the time Darwin published his own book on the subject Descent of Man it was already a well known interpretation of his theory and the interpretation which made the theory highly controversial Even many of Darwin s original supporters such as Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Lyell balked at the idea that human beings could have evolved their apparently boundless mental capacities and moral sensibilities through natural selection Asia edit nbsp Five of the seven known fossil teeth of Homo luzonensis found in Callao Cave the Philippines Prior to the general acceptance of Africa as the root of genus Homo 19th century naturalists sought the origin of humans in Asia So called dragon bones fossil bones and teeth from Chinese apothecary shops were known but it was not until the early 20th century that German paleontologist Max Schlosser first described a single human tooth from Beijing Although Schlosser 1903 was very cautious identifying the tooth only as Anthropoide g et sp indet he was hopeful that future work would discover a new anthropoid in China Eleven years later the Swedish geologist Johan Gunnar Andersson was sent to China as a mining advisor and soon developed an interest in dragon bones It was he who in 1918 discovered the sites around Zhoukoudian a village about 50 kilometers southwest of Beijing However because of the sparse nature of the initial finds the site was abandoned Work did not resume until 1921 when the Austrian paleontologist Otto Zdansky fresh with his doctoral degree from Vienna came to Beijing to work for Andersson Zdansky conducted short term excavations at Locality 1 in 1921 and 1923 and recovered only two teeth of significance one premolar and one molar that he subsequently described cautiously as Homo sp Zdansky 1927 With that done Zdansky returned to Austria and suspended all fieldwork News of the fossil hominin teeth delighted the scientific community in Beijing and plans for developing a larger more systematic project at Zhoukoudian were soon formulated At the epicenter of excitement was Davidson Black a Canadian born anatomist working at Peking Union Medical College Black shared Andersson s interest as well as his view that central Asia was a promising home for early humankind In late 1926 Black submitted a proposal to the Rockefeller Foundation seeking financial support for systematic excavation at Zhoukoudian and the establishment of an institute for the study of human biology in China The Zhoukoudian Project came into existence in the spring of 1927 and two years later the Cenozoic Research Laboratory of the Geological Survey of China was formally established Being the first institution of its kind the Cenozoic Laboratory opened up new avenues for the study of paleogeology and paleontology in China The Laboratory was the precursor of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology IVPP of the Chinese Academy of Science which took its modern form after 1949 The first of the major project finds are attributed to the young Swedish paleontologist Anders Birger Bohlin then serving as the field advisor at Zhoukoudian He recovered a left lower molar that Black 1927 identified as unmistakably human it compared favorably to the previous find made by Zdansky and subsequently coined it Sinanthropus pekinensis 8 The news was at first met with skepticism and many scholars had reservations that a single tooth was sufficient to justify the naming of a new type of early hominin Yet within a little more than two years in the winter of 1929 Pei Wenzhong then the field director at Zhoukoudian unearthed the first complete calvaria of Peking Man Twenty seven years after Schlosser s initial description the antiquity of early humans in East Asia was no longer a speculation but a reality nbsp The Zhoukoudian siteExcavations continued at the site and remained fruitful until the outbreak of the Second Sino Japanese War in 1937 The decade long research yielded a wealth of faunal and lithic materials as well as hominin fossils These included 5 more complete calvaria 9 large cranial fragments 6 facial fragments 14 partial mandibles 147 isolated teeth and 11 postcranial elements estimated to represent as least 40 individuals Evidence of fire marked by ash lenses and burned bones and stones were apparently also present 9 although recent studies have challenged this view 10 Franz Weidenreich came to Beijing soon after Black s untimely death in 1934 and took charge of the study of the hominin specimens Following the loss of the Peking Man materials in late 1941 scientific endeavors at Zhoukoudian slowed primarily because of lack of funding Frantic search for the missing fossils took place and continued well into the 1950s After the establishment of the People s Republic of China in 1949 excavations resumed at Zhoukoudian But with political instability and social unrest brewing in China beginning in 1966 and major discoveries at Olduvai Gorge and East Turkana Koobi Fora the paleoanthropological spotlight shifted westward to East Africa Although China re opened its doors to the West in the late 1970s national policy calling for self reliance coupled with a widened language barrier thwarted all the possibilities of renewed scientific relationships Indeed Harvard anthropologist K C Chang noted international collaboration in developing nations very often a disguise for Western domination became a thing of the past 1977 139 Africa edit nbsp Skull of Australopithecus africanus1920s 1940s edit The first paleoanthropological find made in Africa was the 1921 discovery of the Kabwe 1 skull at Kabwe Broken Hill Zambia Initially this specimen was named Homo rhodesiensis however today it is considered part of the species Homo heidelbergensis 11 In 1924 in a limestone quarry at Taung Professor Raymond Dart discovered a remarkably well preserved juvenile specimen face and brain endocast which he named Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus meaning Southern Ape Although the brain was small 410 cm its shape was rounded unlike the brain shape of chimpanzees and gorillas and more like the shape seen in modern humans In addition the specimen exhibited short canine teeth and the anterior placement of the foramen magnum was more like the placement seen in modern humans than the placement seen in chimpanzees and gorillas suggesting that this species was bipedal All of these traits convinced Dart that the Taung child was a bipedal human ancestor a transitional form between ape and human However Dart s conclusions were largely ignored for decades as the prevailing view of the time was that a large brain evolved before bipedality It took the discovery of additional australopith fossils in Africa that resembled his specimen and the rejection of the Piltdown Man hoax for Dart s claims to be taken seriously In the 1930s paleontologist Robert Broom discovered and described a new species at Kromdraai South Africa Although similar in some ways to Dart s Australopithecus africanus Broom s specimen had much larger cheek teeth Because of this difference Broom named his specimen Paranthropus robustus using a new genus name In doing so he established the practice of grouping gracile australopiths in the genus Australopithecus and robust australopiths in the genus Paranthropus During the 1960s the robust variety was commonly moved into Australopithecus A more recent consensus has been to return to the original classification of Paranthropus as a separate genus 12 1950s 1990s edit The second half of the twentieth century saw a significant increase in the number of paleoanthropological finds made in Africa Many of these finds were associated with the work of the Leakey family in eastern Africa In 1959 Mary Leakey s discovery of the Zinj fossin OH 5 at Olduvai Gorge Tanzania led to the identification of a new species Paranthropus boisei 13 In 1960 the Leakeys discovered the fossil OH 7 also at Olduvai Gorge and assigned it to a new species Homo habilis In 1972 Bernard Ngeneo a fieldworker working for Richard Leakey discovered the fossil KNM ER 1470 near Lake Turkana in Kenya KNM ER 1470 has been interpreted as either a distinct species Homo rudolfensis or alternatively as evidence of sexual dimorphism in Homo habilis 12 In 1967 Richard Leakey reported the earliest definitive examples of anatomically modern Homo sapiens from the site of Omo Kibish in Ethiopia known as the Omo remains 14 In the late 1970s Mary Leakey excavated the famous Laetoli footprints in Tanzania which demonstrated the antiquity of bipedality in the human lineage 12 In 1985 Richard Leakey and Alan Walker discovered a specimen they called the Black Skull found near Lake Turkana This specimen was assigned to another species Paranthropus aethiopicus 15 In 1994 a team led by Meave Leakey announced a new species Australopithecus anamensis based on specimens found near Lake Turkana 12 Numerous other researchers have made important discoveries in eastern Africa Possibly the most famous is the Lucy skeleton discovered in 1973 by Donald Johanson and Maurice Taieb in Ethiopia s Afar Triangle at the site of Hadar On the basis of this skeleton and subsequent discoveries the researchers came up with a new species Australopithecus afarensis 12 In 1975 Colin Groves and Vratislav Mazak announced a new species of human they called Homo ergaster Homo ergaster specimens have been found at numerous sites in eastern and southern Africa 12 In 1994 Tim D White announced a new species Ardipithecus ramidus based on fossils from Ethiopia 16 In 1999 two new species were announced Berhane Asfaw and Tim D White named Australopithecus garhi based on specimens discovered in Ethiopia s Awash valley Meave Leakey announced a new species Kenyanthropus platyops based on the cranium KNM WT 40000 from Lake Turkana 12 21st century edit nbsp Fossil hominid skull display at The Museum of Osteology in Oklahoma City USAIn the 21st century numerous fossils have been found that add to current knowledge of existing species For example in 2001 Zeresenay Alemseged discovered an Australopithecus afarensis child fossil called Selam from the site of Dikika in the Afar region of Ethiopia This find is particularly important because the fossil included a preserved hyoid bone something rarely found in other paleoanthropological fossils but important for understanding the evolution of speech capacities 11 12 Two new species from southern Africa have been discovered and described in recent years In 2008 a team led by Lee Berger announced a new species Australopithecus sediba based on fossils they had discovered in Malapa cave in South Africa 12 In 2015 a team also led by Lee Berger announced another species Homo naledi based on fossils representing 15 individuals from the Rising Star Cave system in South Africa 17 New species have also been found in eastern Africa In 2000 Brigitte Senut and Martin Pickford described the species Orrorin tugenensis based on fossils they found in Kenya In 2004 Yohannes Haile Selassie announced that some specimens previously labeled as Ardipithecus ramidus made up a different species Ardipithecus kadabba 12 In 2015 Haile Selassie announced another new species Australopithecus deyiremeda though some scholars are skeptical that the associated fossils truly represent a unique species 18 Although most hominin fossils from Africa have been found in eastern and southern Africa there are a few exceptions One is Sahelanthropus tchadensis discovered in the central African country of Chad in 2002 This find is important because it widens the assumed geographic range of early hominins 12 Renowned paleoanthropologists editRobert Ardrey 1908 1980 Lee Berger 1965 Davidson Black 1884 1934 Robert Broom 1866 1951 Michel Brunet 1940 J Desmond Clark 1916 2002 Carleton S Coon 1904 1981 Raymond Dart 1893 1988 Eugene Dubois 1858 1940 Johann Carl Fuhlrott 1803 1877 Yohannes Haile Selassie 1961 Sonia Harmand 1974 John D Hawks Ales Hrdlicka 1869 1943 Glynn Isaac 1937 1985 Donald C Johanson 1943 Kamoya Kimeu 1938 2022 Jeffrey Laitman 1951 Louis Leakey 1903 1972 Meave Leakey 1942 Mary Leakey 1913 1996 Richard Leakey 1944 2022 Andre Leroi Gourhan 1911 1986 Peter Wilhelm Lund 1801 1880 Kenneth Oakley 1911 1981 David Pilbeam 1940 Gustav Heinrich Ralph von Koenigswald 1902 1982 John T Robinson 1923 2001 Jeffrey H Schwartz 1948 Chris Stringer 1947 Ian Tattersall 1945 Pierre Teilhard de Chardin 1881 1955 Phillip V Tobias 1925 2012 Erik Trinkaus 1948 Alan Walker 1938 2017 Franz Weidenreich 1873 1948 Tim D White 1950 Milford H Wolpoff 1942 Bernard Wood 1945 See also editDawn of Humanity 2015 PBS film Human evolution The Incredible Human Journey Television documentary film series List of human evolution fossils Timeline of human evolutionReferences edit paleoanthropology Oxford University Press Archived from the original on December 12 2013 Retrieved October 1 2015 paleoanthropology Dictionary com LLC Archived from the original on March 8 2016 Retrieved October 1 2015 Hominoid taxonomies August 1 2001 Science Week University of California Los Angeles Archived from the original on October 23 2018 Retrieved October 2 2015 Paleoanthropology Hominid Family History Communication Studies University of California Los Angeles Archived from the original on October 17 2018 Retrieved October 2 2015 Fossil Hominids The Evidence for Human Evolution Jim Foley Archived from the original on June 3 2019 Retrieved October 2 2015 a b Caroli Linnaei Systema naturae Biodiversity Heritage Library 1894 Archived from the original on November 8 2012 Retrieved September 27 2015 Kerry Bright sponsored by the National Science Foundation at the University of Montana Human Evolution Background Information Evolution Education website evoled org Archived from the original on 2003 12 26 Rukang Wu Olsen John W 2009 09 15 PALEOANTHROPOLOGY AND PALEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGY IN THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA by Wu Rukang John W Olsen Left Coast Press ISBN 9781598744583 Archived from the original on 2023 10 27 Retrieved December 26 2015 Black 1931 page needed full citation needed Weiner et al 1998 page needed full citation needed a b Cartmill M Smith F H 2009 The Human Lineage Vol 2 John Wiley amp Sons a b c d e f g h i j k Boyd R Silk J B 2014 How Humans Evolved WW Norton amp Company Leakey L S B August 1959 A New Fossil Skull From Olduvai Nature 184 4685 491 493 Bibcode 1959Natur 184 491L doi 10 1038 184491a0 ISSN 1476 4687 S2CID 4217460 Archived from the original on 2020 09 14 Retrieved 2020 12 21 Leakey R E F June 1969 Early Homo sapiens Remains from the Omo River Region of South west Ethiopia Faunal Remains from the Omo Valley Nature 222 5199 1132 1133 Bibcode 1969Natur 222 1132L doi 10 1038 2221132a0 ISSN 1476 4687 PMID 5788977 S2CID 4186101 Archived from the original on 2021 05 25 Retrieved 2020 12 21 Walker A Leakey R E Harris J M Brown F H August 1986 2 5 Myr Australopithecus boisei from west of Lake Turkana Kenya Nature 322 6079 517 522 Bibcode 1986Natur 322 517W doi 10 1038 322517a0 ISSN 0028 0836 S2CID 4270200 Archived from the original on 2021 06 10 Retrieved 2020 12 21 White Tim D Suwa Gen Asfaw Berhane 1994 09 22 Australopithecus ramidus a new species of early hominid from Aramis Ethiopia Nature 371 6495 306 312 Bibcode 1994Natur 371 306W doi 10 1038 371306a0 ISSN 0028 0836 PMID 8090200 S2CID 4347140 Archived from the original on 2020 11 15 Retrieved 2020 12 21 Berger Lee 2015 Homo naledi a new species of the genus Homo from the Dinaledi Chamber South Africa eLife 4 doi 10 7554 eLife 09560 001 Haile Selassie Yohannes Gibert Luis Melillo Stephanie M Ryan Timothy M Alene Mulugeta Deino Alan Levin Naomi E Scott Gary Saylor Beverly Z May 2015 New species from Ethiopia further expands Middle Pliocene hominin diversity Nature 521 7553 483 488 Bibcode 2015Natur 521 483H doi 10 1038 nature14448 ISSN 0028 0836 PMID 26017448 S2CID 4455029 Archived from the original on 2021 02 14 Retrieved 2020 12 21 Further reading editDavid R Begun A Companion to Paleoanthropology Malden Wiley Blackwell 2013 Winfried Henke Ian Tattersall eds Handbook of Paleoanthropology Dordrecht Springer 2007 External links edit nbsp Wikibooks has a book on the topic of Introduction to Paleoanthropology Paleoanthropology in the 1990s Essays by James Q Jacobs Fossil Hominids Aspects of Paleoanthropology Becoming Human Paleoanthropology Evolution and Human Origins Department of Human Evolution Max Planck Institute Leipzig Human Timeline Interactive Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History August 2016 Portals nbsp Evolutionary biology nbsp Paleontology Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Paleoanthropology amp oldid 1186581115, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.