fbpx
Wikipedia

Hilsenhoff Biotic Index

The Hilsenhoff Biotic Index (HBI) is a quantitative method of evaluating the abundance of arthropod fauna in stream ecosystems as a measurement of estimating water quality based on the predetermined pollution tolerances of the observed taxa. This biotic index was created by William Hilsenhoff in 1977 to measure the effects of oxygen depletion in Wisconsin streams resulting from organic or nutrient pollution.[1]

Calculating the HBI

The collection sample should contain 100+ arthropods. A tolerance value of 0 to 10 is assigned to each arthropod species (or genera) based on its known prevalence in stream habitats with varying states of detritus contamination. A highly tolerant species would receive a value of 10, while a species collected only in unaltered streams with high water quality would receive a value of 0.[2][3] The sum products of the number of individuals in each species (or genera) multiplied by the tolerance of the species is divided by the total number of specimens in the sample to determine the HBI value.

 ;

where n = number of specimens in taxa; a = tolerance value of taxa; N = total number of specimens in the sample.

Precautions should be taken to account for confounding variables, such as the effects of dominant species over-abundance, seasonal temperature stress,[4] and water currents. Limiting the collection of individuals from each species to a maximum of 10 (10-Max BI) has been shown to minimize the effects of these phenomena on the True BI.[2]

The biotic index is then ranked for water quality and degree of organic pollution, as follows:

Evaluation of Water Quality Using Biotic Index Values[3]
Biotic Index Water Quality Degree of Organic Pollution
0.00 - 3.50 Excellent No apparent organic pollution
3.51 - 4.50 Very Good Possible slight organic pollution
4.51 - 5.50 Good Some organic pollution
5.51 - 6.50 Fair Fairly significant organic pollution
6.51 - 7.50 Fairly Poor Significant organic pollution
7.51 - 8.50 Poor Very significant organic pollution
8.51 - 10.00 Very Poor Severe organic pollution

References

  1. ^ Hilsenhoff, W. L. Use of Arthropods to Evaluate Water Quality of Streams. Wis. Dep. Nat. Resour. Technical Bulletin, 100 (1977).
  2. ^ a b Hilsenhoff, William (2018-01-11). "A Modification of the Biotic Index of Organic Stream Pollution to Remedy Problems and Permit Its Use Throughout the Year". The Great Lakes Entomologist. 31 (1). ISSN 0090-0222.
  3. ^ a b Hilsenhoff, William (2017-11-03). "An Improved Biotic Index of Organic Stream Pollution". The Great Lakes Entomologist. 20 (1). ISSN 0090-0222.
  4. ^ Hilsenhoff, William (2017-11-13). "Seasonal Correction Factors for the Biotic Index". The Great Lakes Entomologist. 21 (1). ISSN 0090-0222.


hilsenhoff, biotic, index, quantitative, method, evaluating, abundance, arthropod, fauna, stream, ecosystems, measurement, estimating, water, quality, based, predetermined, pollution, tolerances, observed, taxa, this, biotic, index, created, william, hilsenhof. The Hilsenhoff Biotic Index HBI is a quantitative method of evaluating the abundance of arthropod fauna in stream ecosystems as a measurement of estimating water quality based on the predetermined pollution tolerances of the observed taxa This biotic index was created by William Hilsenhoff in 1977 to measure the effects of oxygen depletion in Wisconsin streams resulting from organic or nutrient pollution 1 Calculating the HBI EditThe collection sample should contain 100 arthropods A tolerance value of 0 to 10 is assigned to each arthropod species or genera based on its known prevalence in stream habitats with varying states of detritus contamination A highly tolerant species would receive a value of 10 while a species collected only in unaltered streams with high water quality would receive a value of 0 2 3 The sum products of the number of individuals in each species or genera multiplied by the tolerance of the species is divided by the total number of specimens in the sample to determine the HBI value H B I S n i a i N displaystyle HBI frac Sigma n i a i N where n number of specimens in taxa a tolerance value of taxa N total number of specimens in the sample Precautions should be taken to account for confounding variables such as the effects of dominant species over abundance seasonal temperature stress 4 and water currents Limiting the collection of individuals from each species to a maximum of 10 10 Max BI has been shown to minimize the effects of these phenomena on the True BI 2 The biotic index is then ranked for water quality and degree of organic pollution as follows Evaluation of Water Quality Using Biotic Index Values 3 Biotic Index Water Quality Degree of Organic Pollution0 00 3 50 Excellent No apparent organic pollution3 51 4 50 Very Good Possible slight organic pollution4 51 5 50 Good Some organic pollution5 51 6 50 Fair Fairly significant organic pollution6 51 7 50 Fairly Poor Significant organic pollution7 51 8 50 Poor Very significant organic pollution8 51 10 00 Very Poor Severe organic pollutionReferences Edit Hilsenhoff W L Use of Arthropods to Evaluate Water Quality of Streams Wis Dep Nat Resour Technical Bulletin 100 1977 a b Hilsenhoff William 2018 01 11 A Modification of the Biotic Index of Organic Stream Pollution to Remedy Problems and Permit Its Use Throughout the Year The Great Lakes Entomologist 31 1 ISSN 0090 0222 a b Hilsenhoff William 2017 11 03 An Improved Biotic Index of Organic Stream Pollution The Great Lakes Entomologist 20 1 ISSN 0090 0222 Hilsenhoff William 2017 11 13 Seasonal Correction Factors for the Biotic Index The Great Lakes Entomologist 21 1 ISSN 0090 0222 This statistics related article is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte This arthropod related article is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Hilsenhoff Biotic Index amp oldid 1123341326, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.