Crimes against humanity

Not to be confused with War crime.

Crimes against humanity are widespread or systemic criminal acts which are committed by or on behalf of a de facto authority, usually by or on behalf of a state, that grossly violate human rights. Unlike war crimes, crimes against humanity can be committed during both peace and war.^[1] They are not isolated or sporadic events because they are part of a government policy or they are part of a widespread practice of atrocities which is tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. ^[2] They do not need to be part of an official policy, but they only need to be tolerated by authorities.

The Armenian genocide (pictured) was the first event which was officially condemned as a "crime against humanity" in the May 1915 Triple Entente declaration.

The first prosecution for crimes against humanity took place during the Nuremberg trials. Initially considered for legal use, widely in international law, following the Holocaust, a global standard of human rights was articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948).

Since the Nuremberg trials, crimes against humanity have been prosecuted by other international courts (such as the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, and the International Criminal Court) as well as by domestic courts. The law of crimes against humanity has primarily been developed as a result of the evolution of customary international law. Crimes against humanity are not codified in an international convention, so an international effort to establish such a treaty, led by the Crimes Against Humanity Initiative, is currently underway.

War of aggression, war crimes, murder, massacres, dehumanization, genocide, ethnic cleansing, deportations, unethical human experimentation, extrajudicial punishments including summary executions, the use of weapons of mass destruction, state terrorism or state sponsorship of terrorism, death squads, kidnappings and forced disappearances, the use of child soldiers, unjust imprisonment, enslavement, torture, rape, political repression, racial discrimination, religious persecution and other human rights abuses may reach the threshold of crimes against humanity if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice.

Origins of the term

The term "crimes against humanity" is potentially ambiguous because of the ambiguity of the word "humanity", which originally meant the quality of being human (first recorded in AD1384) but more recently took on another meaning as a synonym of mankind (first recorded in AD 1450).^[3] The context of the term in documents related to the Nuremberg trials shows that the original sense is intended.^[4]

Abolition of the slave trade

In 1814, several bilateral treaties that were signed foreshadowed the signing of the multilateral treaty of the Final Act of the Congress of Vienna (1815) because they contained moral language and wording which expressed condemnation of the slave trade. For example, the Treaty of Paris between Britain and France (1814) included the wording "principles of natural justice"; and the British and United States plenipotentiaries stated in the Treaty of Ghent (1814) that the slave trade violated the "principles of humanity and justice".^[5]

The multilateral Declaration of the Powers, on the Abolition of the Slave Trade, of 8 February 1815 (which also formed Section XV of the Final Act of the Congress of Vienna of the same year) included in its first sentence the concept of the "principles of humanity and universal morality" as justification for ending a trade that was "odious in its continuance".^[6]

The Republican Party Platform for the 1856 election for President of the United States stated:

That all these things have been done with the knowledge, sanction, and procurement of the present National Administration; and that for this high crime against the Constitution, the Union, and humanity, we arraign that Administration, the President, his advisers, agents, supporters, apologists, and accessories, either before or after the fact, before the country and before the world; and that it is our fixed purpose to bring the actual perpetrators of these atrocious outrages and their accomplices to a sure and condign punishment thereafter.^[7]

First uses of the term

On Sunday, June 4, 1854, at the Music Hall in Boston, the Unitarian minister and abolitionist Theodore Parker, preached a sermon which he titled "A new crime against humanity" in protest against the judicial proceedings which authorized the return of a man who was named Anthony Burns from Boston to Alexandria, Virginia, under the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.^[8]

The Republican Platform for the 1860 election for President of the United States subsequently used the phrase in its ninth article:

9. That we brand the recent reopening of the African slave trade, under the cover of our national flag, aided by perversions of judicial power, as a crime against humanity and a burning shame to our country and age; and we call upon Congress to take prompt and efficient measures for the total and final suppression of that execrable traffic.^[9]

 

Leopold II, King of the Belgians and de facto owner of the Congo Free State, whose agents were accused of crimes against humanity

The term "crimes against humanity" was used by George Washington Williams,^[10] an American minister, politician and historian, in a letter he wrote to the United States Secretary of State describing the atrocities committed by Leopold II of Belgium's administration in the Congo Free State in 1890.^[11] This was an early but not, as is often claimed, the first use of the term in its modern sense in the English language. In his first annual message in December 1889, U.S. President Benjamin Harrison spoke about the slave trade in Africa as a "crime against humanity". Already in 1883, George Washington Williams used the same term in his reflections about slavery in the United States.^[12]

In treaty law, the term originated in the Second Hague Convention of 1899 preamble and was expanded in the Fourth Hague Convention of 1907 preamble and their respective regulations, which were concerned with the codification of new rules of international humanitarian law. The preamble of the two Conventions referenced the "laws of humanity" as an expression of underlying inarticulated humanistic values.^[13] The term is part of what is known as the Martens Clause.

On May 24, 1915, the Allied Powers, Britain, France, and Russia, jointly issued a statement explicitly and for the first time ever charging another government of committing "a crime against humanity". An excerpt from this joint statement reads:

In view of these new crimes of Ottoman Empire against humanity and civilization, the Allied Governments announce publicly to the Sublime Porte that they will hold personally responsible for these crimes all members of the Ottoman Government, as well as those of their agents who are implicated in such massacres.^[14]

At the conclusion of the war, the Allied Commission of Responsibilities recommended the creation of a tribunal to try "violations of the laws of humanity" because the law of war did not cover atrocities committed by a state against its own nationals or allied persons.^[15] However, the US representative objected to references to "law of humanity" as being imprecise and insufficiently developed at that time and the concept was not pursued.^[16]

Nonetheless, a UN report in 1948 referred to the usage of the term "crimes against humanity" in regard to the Armenian genocide as a precedent to the Nüremberg and Tokyo trials. On May 15, 1948, the Economic and Social Council presented a 384-pages report prepared by the United Nations War Crimes Commission (UNWCC),^[17] set up in London (October 1943) to collect and collate information on war crimes and war criminals.^{[18] : 129} The report was in compliance to the request by the UN Secretary-General to make arrangements for "the collection and publication of information concerning human rights arising from trials of war criminals, quislings and traitors, and in particular from the Nuremberg trials and Tokyo Trials." The report had been prepared by members of the Legal Staff of the commission. The report is highly topical in regard to the Armenian Genocide, not only because it uses the 1915 events as a historic example, but also as a precedent to the Articles 6 (c) and 5 (c) of the Nuremberg and Tokyo Charters, and thereby as a precursor to the then newly adopted UN Genocide Convention, differentiating between war crimes and crimes against humanity. By refereeing to the information collected during WWI and put forward by the 1919 Commission of Responsibilities, the report entitled "Information Concerning Human Rights Arising from Trials of War Criminals" used the Armenian case as a vivid example of committed crimes by a state against its own citizens. The report also noted that while the Paris Peace Treaties with Germany, Austria, Hungary and Bulgaria did not include any reference to "laws of humanity", instead basing the charges on violations of "laws and customs of war", the Sèvres Peace Treaty with Turkey did so. In addition to the Articles 226–228, concerning customs of war (corresponding to Articles 228–230 of the Treaty of Versailles), the Sèvres Treaty also contained an additional Article 230, obviously in compliance with the Allied ultimatum of May 24, 1915 in regard to committed "crimes against humanity and civilization".^[18]: 130

Nuremberg trials

Main article: Nuremberg trials

 

Nuremberg Trials. The defendants are in the dock. The main target of the prosecution was Hermann Göring (at the left edge on the first row of benches), considered to be the most important surviving official in the Third Reich after Hitler's death.

After the Second World War, the Nuremberg Charter set down the laws and procedures by which the Nuremberg trials were to be conducted. The drafters of this document were faced with the problem of how to respond to the Holocaust and other grave crimes committed in Germany and German-allied states by the Nazi regime. Like in World War I, a traditional understanding of war crimes gave no provision for atrocities committed by a state on its own citizens or its allies.^[15] Therefore, Article 6 of the Charter was drafted to include not only traditional war crimes and crimes against peace, but also crimes against humanity, defined as:

Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.^[19][20]

Under this definition, crimes against humanity could be punished only insofar as they could be connected somehow to war crimes or crimes against peace.^[21] The jurisdictional limitation was explained by the American chief representative to the London Conference, Robert H. Jackson, who pointed out that it "has been a general principle from time immemorial that the internal affairs of another government are not ordinarily our business". Thus, "it is justifiable that we interfere or attempt to bring retribution to individuals or to states only because the concentration camps and the deportations were in pursuance of a common plan or enterprise of making an unjust war".^[21] The judgement of the first Nuremberg trial found that "the policy of persecution, repression and murder of civilians" and persecution of Jews within Germany before the outbreak of war in 1939 were not crimes against humanity, because as "revolting and horrible as many of these crimes were, it has not been satisfactorily proved that they were done in execution of, or in connection with," war crimes or crimes against peace.^[22] The subsequent Nuremberg trials were conducted under Control Council Law No. 10 which included a revised definition of crimes against humanity with a wider scope.^[23]

Tokyo Trial

See also: International Military Tribunal for the Far East

 

The defendants at the Tokyo International Tribunal. General Hideki Tojo was one of the main defendants and is in the centre of the middle row.

The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE), also known as the Tokyo Trial, was convened to try the leaders of the Empire of Japan for three types of crimes: "Class A" (crimes against peace), "Class B" (war crimes), and "Class C" (crimes against humanity), committed during the Second World War.

The legal basis for the trial was established by the Charter of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (CIMTFE) that was proclaimed on 19 January 1946. The tribunal convened on May 3, 1946, and was adjourned on November 12, 1948.

In the Tokyo Trial, Crimes against Humanity (Class C) was not applied for any suspect.^{[24][25][additional citation(s) needed]} Prosecutions related to the Nanking Massacre were categorised as infringements upon the Laws of War.^{[26][additional citation(s) needed]}

A panel of eleven judges presided over the IMTFE, one each from victorious Allied powers (United States, Republic of China, Soviet Union, United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Provisional Government of the French Republic, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, British India, and the Philippines).

Types of crimes against humanity

The definition of a crime against humanity varies between and within countries internationally and on the domestic level. Isolated inhumane acts of a certain nature committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack may instead constitute grave infringements of human rights, or – depending on the circumstances – war crimes but are not classified as crimes against humanity.^[27]

Apartheid

Main article: Crime of apartheid

The systematic persecution of one racial group by another, such as occurred during the South African apartheid government, was recognized as a crime against humanity by the United Nations General Assembly in 1976.^[28] The Charter of the United Nations, Articles 13, 14, 15 makes actions of the General Assembly advisory to the Security Council.^[29] In regard to apartheid in particular, the UN General Assembly has not made any findings, nor have apartheid-related trials for crimes against humanity been conducted.

Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and Michael Lynk (UN Special Rapporteur for the Palestinian occupied territory) have accused Israel of committing apartheid against Palestinians.^[30][31][32]

Rape and sexual violence

Neither the Nuremberg nor Tokyo Charters contained an explicit provision recognizing sexual and gender-based crimes as war crimes or crimes against humanity, although Control Council Law No. 10 recognized rape as a crime against humanity. The statutes of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda both included rape as a crime against humanity. The ICC is the first international instrument expressly to include various forms of sexual and gender-based crimes – including rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilisation, and other forms of sexual violence – as both an underlying act of crimes against humanity and war crime committed in international and/or non-international armed conflicts.^[33]

In 2008, the U.N. Security Council adopted resolution 1820, which noted that "rape and other forms of sexual violence can constitute war crimes, crimes against humanity or a constitutive act with respect to genocide".^[34]

On 14 April 2021, the Special Jurisdiction for Peace "accredited five LGBTI persons as victims of the Colombian armed conflict and resolved that their gender-based persecution might have amounted to a crime against humanity".^[35]

Legal status of crimes against humanity in international law

Unlike genocide and war crimes, which have been widely recognized and prohibited in international criminal law since the establishment of the Nuremberg principles,^[36][37] there has never been a comprehensive convention on crimes against humanity,^[38] even though such crimes are continuously perpetrated worldwide in numerous conflicts and crises.^[39][40][41] There are eleven international texts defining crimes against humanity, but they all differ slightly as to their definition of that crime and its legal elements.^[42] In 2008, the Crimes Against Humanity Initiative was launched to address this gap in international law.^[43]

On July 30, 2013, the United Nations International Law Commission voted to include the topic of crimes against humanity in its long-term program of work. In July 2014, the Commission moved this topic to its active programme of work^[44][45] based largely on a report submitted by Sean D. Murphy (the Special Rapporteur for Crimes Against Humanity).^[46]

There is some debate on the status of crimes against humanity under customary international law is. M. Cherif Bassiouni argues that crimes against humanity are part of jus cogens and as such constitute a non-derogable rule of international law.^[42]

United Nations

The United Nations has been primarily responsible for the prosecution of crimes against humanity since it was chartered in 1948.^[47]

After Nuremberg, there was no international court with jurisdiction over crimes against humanity for almost 50 years. However, work continued on developing the definition of crimes against humanity at the United Nations. For instance, in 1947, the International Law Commission was charged by the United Nations General Assembly with the formulation of the principles of international law recognized and reinforced in the Nuremberg Charter and judgment, and they were also tasked with drafting a 'code of offenses against the peace and security of mankind'. Completed 50 years later in 1996, the Draft Code defined crimes against humanity as various inhumane acts, i.e., "murder, extermination, torture, enslavement, persecution on political, racial, religious or ethnic grounds, institutionalized discrimination, arbitrary deportation or forcible transfer of population, arbitrary imprisonment, rape, enforced prostitution and other inhuman acts committed in a systematic manner or on a large scale and instigated or directed by a Government or by any organization or group." This definition differs from the one used in Nuremberg, where the criminal acts were to have been committed "before or during the war", thus establishing a nexus between crimes against humanity and armed conflict.^[48]

On 21 March 2013, at its 22nd session, the United Nations Human Rights Council established the Commission of Inquiry on human rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). The Commission was mandated to investigate the systematic, widespread, and grave violations of human rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, with a view to ensuring full accountability, in particular for violations that may amount to crimes against humanity.^[49] The Commission dealt with matters relating to crimes against humanity on the basis of definitions set out by customary international criminal law and in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.^[50] The 2014 Report by the Commission found "the body of testimony and other information it received establishes that crimes against humanity have been committed in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, pursuant to policies established at the highest level of the State [....] These crimes against humanity entail extermination, murder, enslavement, torture, imprisonment, rape, forced abortions and other sexual violence, persecution on political, religious, racial and gender grounds, the forcible transfer of populations, the enforced disappearance of persons and the inhumane act of knowingly causing prolonged starvation. The Commission further finds that crimes against humanity are ongoing in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea because the policies, institutions and patterns of impunity that lie at their heart remain in place." Additionally, the Commission found that crimes against humanity have been committed against starving populations, particularly during the 1990s and that they were still being committed against persons from other countries who were systematically abducted or denied repatriation because they sought to gain labour and other skills for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.^[50]

Security Council

UN Security Council Resolution 1674, adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 28 April 2006, "reaffirms the provisions of paragraphs 138 and 139 of the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document regarding the responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity".^[51] The resolution commits the Council to action to protect civilians in armed conflict.

In 2008 the UN Security Council adopted resolution 1820, which noted that "rape and other forms of sexual violence can constitute war crimes, crimes against humanity or a constitutive act with respect to genocide".^[34]

According to the United Nations Security Council resolution 1970 (2011) concerning Libya, any direct or indirect trade of arms to the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, in the form of supply, transfer, or sale should be prevented by the member nations. The arms embargo restricts the supply of arms, weapons, military vehicles, spare parts, technical assistance, finances, and the provision of armed mercenaries with origins of a country other than the one providing.^[52][53]

Later, the United Nations claimed in its November 2019 report that the United Arab Emirates, Jordan and Turkey were then violating the arms embargo imposed on Libya under the 1970 resolution.^[54] An airstrike on the migrant detention center in Tripoli in July 2019, believed to have been carried out by the United Arab Emirates, can be amounted as a war crime, as stated by the United Nations. The airstrike was deadlier than the 2011 militarized uprising that overthrew the regime of Muammar Gaddafi.^[55]

International courts and criminal tribunals

After the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials of 1945–1946, another international tribunal with jurisdiction over crimes against humanity was not established for another five decades. In response to atrocities committed in the 1990s, multiple ad hoc tribunals were established with jurisdiction over crimes against humanity. The statutes of the International Criminal Court, the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda each contain different definitions of crimes against humanity.^[56]

International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia

Main article: International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia

In 1993, the UN Security Council established the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), with jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute three international crimes which had taken place in the former Yugoslavia: genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Article 5 of the ICTY Statute states that:

The International Tribunal shall have the power to prosecute persons responsible for the following crimes when committed in armed conflict, whether international or internal in character, and directed against any civilian population:^[57]

(a) murder;

(b) extermination;

(c) enslavement;

(d) deportation;

(e) imprisonment;

(f) torture;

(g) rape;

(h) persecutions on political, racial and religious grounds;

(i) other inhumane acts."

This definition of crimes against humanity revived the original ‘Nuremberg’ nexus with armed conflict, connecting crimes against humanity to both international and non-international armed conflict. It also expanded the list of criminal acts used in Nuremberg to include imprisonment, torture and rape.^[57] Cherif Bassiouni has argued that this definition was necessary as the conflict in the former Yugoslavia was considered to be a conflict of both an international and non-international nature. Therefore, this adjusted definition of crimes against humanity was necessary to afford the tribunal jurisdiction over this crime.^[58]

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Main article: International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

The UN Security Council established the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in 1994 following the Rwandan genocide. Under the ICTR Statute, the link between crimes against humanity and an armed conflict of any kind was dropped. Rather, the requirement was added that the inhumane acts must be part of a "systematic or widespread attack against any civilian population on national, political, ethnic, racial or religious grounds."^[59] Unlike the conflict in the former Yugoslavia, the conflict in Rwanda was deemed to be non-international, so crimes against humanity would likely not have been applicable if the nexus to armed conflict had been maintained.

Special Court for Sierra Leone

Main article: Special Court for Sierra Leone

Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)

Main article: Cambodia Tribunal

International Criminal Court

Main article: International Criminal Court

 

Headquarters of the ICC in The Hague

In 2002, the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established in The Hague (Netherlands), and the Rome Statute provides for the ICC to have jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. ICC proceedings definitions of a "crime against humanity" have evolved significantly from its original legal definition or that used by the UN.^[60] Essentially, the Rome Statute employs the same definition of crimes against humanity that the ICTR Statute does, minus the requirement that the attack was carried out ‘on national, political, ethnic, racial or religious grounds’. In addition, the Rome Statute definition offers the most expansive list of specific criminal acts that may constitute crimes against humanity to date.

Article 7 of the treaty stated that:

For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:^[61]

(a) Murder;

(b) Extermination;

(c) Enslavement;

(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;

(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;

(f) Torture;

(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;

(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;

(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;

(j) The crime of apartheid;

(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health;

The Rome Statute Explanatory Memorandum states that crimes against humanity:

are particularly odious offenses in that they constitute a serious attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or a degradation of one or more human beings. They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. However, murder, extermination, torture, rape, political, racial, or religious persecution and other inhumane acts reach the threshold of crimes against humanity only if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice. Isolated inhumane acts of this nature may constitute grave infringements of human rights, or depending on the circumstances, war crimes, but may fall short of meriting the stigma attaching to the category of crimes under discussion. On the other hand, an individual may be guilty of crimes against humanity even if he perpetrates one or two of the offences mentioned above, or engages in one such offense against only a few civilians, provided those offenses are part of a consistent pattern of misbehavior by a number of persons linked to that offender (for example, because they engage in armed action on the same side or because they are parties to a common plan or for any similar reason.) Consequently when one or more individuals are not accused of planning or carrying out a policy of inhumanity, but simply of perpetrating specific atrocities or vicious acts, in order to determine whether the necessary threshold is met one should use the following test: one ought to look at these atrocities or acts in their context and verify whether they may be regarded as part of an overall policy or a consistent pattern of an inhumanity, or whether they instead constitute isolated or sporadic acts of cruelty and wickedness.^[62]

To fall under the Rome Statute, a crime against humanity which is defined in Article 7.1 must be "part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population". Article 7.2.a states "For the purpose of paragraph 1: 'Attack directed against any civilian population means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack'." This means that an individual crime on its own, or even a number of such crimes, would not fall under the Rome Statute unless they were the result of a state policy or an organizational policy. This was confirmed by Luis Moreno Ocampo in an open letter publishing his conclusions about allegations of crimes committed during the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 which might fall under the ICC. In a section entitled "Allegations concerning Genocide and Crimes against Humanity," Ocampo states that "the available information provided no reasonable indicator of the required elements for a crime against humanity," i.e., 'a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population'".^[63]

The ICC can only prosecute crimes against humanity in situations under which it has jurisdiction. The ICC only has jurisdiction over crimes contained in its statute – genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity – which have been committed on the territory of a State party to the Rome Statute, when a non-party State refers a situation within its country to the court, or when the United Nation Security Council refers a case to the ICC.^[64] In 2005 the UN referred to the ICC the situation in Darfur. This referral resulted in an indictment of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in 2008.^[65] When the ICC President reported to the UN regarding its progress handling these crimes against humanity case, Judge Phillipe Kirsch said "The Court does not have the power to arrest these persons. That is the responsibility of States and other actors. Without arrests, there can be no trials.^[66]

Council of Europe

The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 30 April 2002 issued a recommendation to the member states, on the protection of women against violence. In the section "Additional measures concerning violence in conflict and post-conflict situations", states in paragraph 69 that member states should: "penalize rape, sexual slavery, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity as an intolerable violation of human rights, as crimes against humanity and, when committed in the context of an armed conflict, as war crimes;"^[67]

In the Explanatory Memorandum on this recommendation when considering paragraph 69:

Reference should be made to the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal adopted in Rome in July 1998. Article 7 of the Statute defines rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity, as crimes against humanity. Furthermore, Article 8 of the Statute defines rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization or any other form of sexual violence as a serious breach of the Geneva Conventions and as war crimes.^[68]

20th century

 

Argentines commemorate victims of military junta, 24 March 2019

Numerous sources cite the 20th century to be the bloodiest century in global history.^[69][70] Millions of civilian infants, children, adults, and elderly people died in warfare. One civilian perished for every combatant killed.^[71] Prior to World War II, war criminals did not face the possibility of prosecution, apprehension, or imprisonment.^[72] Britain's Prime Minister Winston Churchill favored the outright execution of war criminals.^[73] The United States was more lenient and called for a just trial.^[73] The British Government was convinced to institute the Nuremberg Trial which left several legacies. These are worldwide jurisdiction for severe war crimes, creation of international war crime tribunals, judicial procedures that documented history of colossal crimes effectively, and success of UN courts in holding impartial trials.^[73]

The UN pointed out the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) specifically Article 7 (Crimes against Humanity), which defines large-scale acts of violence against a locality's civilian populace. These acts consist of murder; annihilation; enslavement; bondage; forced removal of the population; imprisonment or deprivation of physical liberty that violates international laws; maltreatment; forced prostitution and rape; discrimination and tyranny against certain groups; apartheid (racial discrimination and segregation); and, other inhumane acts.^[74] A publication from Trial International mentioned that crimes against humanity have been collated starting in 1990. These were the 1993 Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia, 1994 Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda, and 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The latter contains the latest and most extensive list of detailed crimes against civilians.^[75]

21st century

A report on the 2008–09 Gaza War by Richard Goldstone accused Israeli and Hamas forces of possibly committing a crime against humanity. The report concluded that Israel had used disproportionate force, targeted Palestinian civilians, used them as human shields, and destroyed civilian infrastructure. Hamas was found to have deliberately targeted Israeli civilians and Israeli infrastructure by mounting indiscriminate rocket attacks. Both the Israeli government and Hamas dismissed the findings of the report.^[76][77][78]

In 2019, United Nations investigators announced that Israeli troops may have committed crimes against humanity. During the Gaza protests 189 Palestinians were killed, investigators said, 183 were shot with live ammunition, including 35 children, three health workers, and two journalists.^[79][80][81] Amnesty International has accused Israel of committing the crime of apartheid against Palestinians.^[30][82]

In 2022, the UN Human Rights Office assessment of human rights concerns in Xinjiang concluded that the extent of arbitrary and discriminatory detention of members of Uyghur and other predominantly Muslim groups in China, since 2017, pursuant to law and policy, in context of restrictions and deprivation more generally of fundamental rights enjoyed individually and collectively, may constitute international crimes, in particular crimes against humanity.^[83][84][85]

The Myanmar military's targeting of the Rohingya Muslims in which more than 25,000 have been killed and more than 18,000 women and girls have been systematically raped have been labelled as crimes against humanity by United Nations and Amnesty International.^[86][87][88] OHCHR Independent Fact-Finding Mission have found Tatmadaw of committing crimes against humanity, genocide, and ethnic cleansing.^[89][90]

See also

•  Genocide portal

• Charter of the United Nations
• Crimes against humanity under communist regimes
• Crimes Against Humanity Initiative
• Genocide Convention
• Historical revisionism (negationism)
• Hate crimes
• Honor killing
• Human rights
• Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
• International Criminal Court
• Mass atrocity crimes
• Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
• Rule of Law
• Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action
• War crimes
• Universal jurisdiction

References

1. Margaret M. DeGuzman,"Crimes Against Humanity" Research Handbook on International Criminal Law, Bartram S. Brown, ed., Edgar Elgar Publishing, 2011.
2. Zegveld, Liesbeth. Accountability of Armed Opposition Groups. p. 107.
3. Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford University Press, retrieved 15 August 2023
4. Luban, David (2004). "A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity". The Yale Journal of International Law. 29 (1): 85–167.
5. Martin, Francisco Forrest (2007). The Constitution as Treaty: The International Legal Constructionalist Approach to the U.S. Constitution. Cambridge University Press. p. 101. ISBN 978-1139467186.
6. Plenipotentiaries of the treaty (1816). The Parliamentary Debates from the Year 1803 to the Present Time. Vol. 32. s.n. p. 200.
7. "Republican Party Platform of 1856". presidency.ucsb.edu. June 18, 1856. Retrieved 2021-06-07.
8. Parker, Theodore (1854). "The New Crime Against Humanity: A Sermon Preached at the Music Hall, in Boston, on Sunday, June 4, 1854". Retrieved 2022-12-28.
9. "Republican Party Platform of 1860". presidency.ucsb.edu. May 17, 1860. Retrieved 2021-06-07.
10. Provost, René; Akhavan, Payam, eds. (2010). Confronting Genocide. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 33. ISBN 978-9048198405.
11. Hochschild, A. King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror and Heroism in Colonial Africa. Houghton Mifflin, 1999. pp. 111–112.
12. Lösing, Felix (2020). A 'Crisis of Whiteness' in the 'Heart of Darkness'. Racism and the Congo Reform Movement. Bielefeld: transcript. p. 80. ISBN 978-3-8376-5498-1. OCLC 1182579739.
13. Cherif Bassiouni, M. Crimes against Humanity: Historical Evolution and Contemporary Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 86
14. 1915 declaration
    • Affirmation of the United States Record on the Armenian Genocide Resolution 106th Congress,2nd Session, House of Representatives
    • Affirmation of the United States Record on the Armenian Genocide Resolution (Introduced in House of Representatives) 109th Congress, 1st Session, H.RES.316, June 14, 2005. 15 September 2005 House Committee/Subcommittee:International Relations actions. Status: Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 40–7.
    • "Crimes Against Humanity", 23 British Yearbook of International Law (1946) p. 181
    • Schabas References pp. 16–17
    • Original source of the telegram sent by the Department of State, Washington containing the French, British and Russian joint declaration
15. Hakemli Makale, Sümeyra Tekin. "THE ORIGINS OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: FROM NUREMBERG TO ROME". DergiPark. p. 156-157.
16. Cryer, Robert; Hakan Friman; Darryl Robinson; Elizabeth Wilmshurst (2007). An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure. Cambridge University Press. pp. 188.
17. "E/CN.4/W.19". UN.org.
18. Avedian, Vahagn (2018). Knowledge and Acknowledgement in the Politics of Memory of the Armenian Genocide. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-13-831885-4.
19. "Nuremberg War Crimes Trial: The Charter Provisions". avalon.law.yale.edu.
20. Nicolas Werth, Karel Bartošek, Jean-Louis Panné, Jean-Louis Margolin, Andrzej Paczkowski, Stéphane Courtois, The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression, Harvard University Press, 858 pages, ISBN 0-674-07608-7, p. 6.
21. Hilberg, Raul (2003). The Destruction of the European Jews (3rd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. pp. 1145–1147. ISBN 978-0300095579.
22. Judgement : The Law Relating to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity contained in the Avalon Project archive at Yale Law School
23. Wolfe, Robert (1 January 1998). "Flaws in the Nuremberg Legacy: An Impediment to International War Crimes Tribunals' Prosecution of Crimes Against Humanity". Holocaust and Genocide Studies. 12 (3): 443–444. doi:10.1093/hgs/12.3.434.
24. Higurashi, Yoshinobu (2008). Tokyo Saiban 東京裁判 [The Tokyo Trial] (in Japanese). Kodansha. pp. 26, 116–119. ISBN 978-4062879248.
25. Hayashi, Hirofumi (2005). BC-kyū Senpan Saiban BC級戦犯裁判 [The Class B & C War Criminal Trials] (in Japanese). Iwanami Shoten Publishers. p. 33. ISBN 978-4004309529.
26. Higurashi 2008, pp. 116–119.
27. As quoted by Guy Horton in Dying Alive – A Legal Assessment of Human Rights Violations in Burma April 2005, co-Funded by The Netherlands Ministry for Development Co-Operation. See section "12.52 Crimes against humanity", p. 201. He references RSICC/C, Vol. 1 p. 360
28. International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid October 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine adopted and opened for signature, ratification by General Assembly resolution 3068 (XXVIII) of 30 November 1973. It entered into force 18 July 1976, in accordance with article X (10)
29. . Archived from the original on April 17, 2009.
30. "Israel's apartheid against Palestinians: a cruel system of domination and a crime against humanity". February 2022.
31. Shakir, Omar (27 April 2021). "A Threshold Crossed. Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution". Human Rights Watch.
32. "Israel's occupation of Palestinian Territory is 'apartheid': UN rights expert". 25 March 2022.
33. "ICC Prosecutor's Policy Paper on Sexual and Gender-Based Crimes" June 2014
34. "Security Council Demands Immediate and Coomplete Halt to Acts of Sexual Violence Against Civilians in Combat Zones, Unanimously Adopting Resolution 1820 (2008)". Un.org. Retrieved 2013-02-01.
35. Aboueldahab, Susann (2021-05-04). "Gender-based persecution as a crime against humanity: A milestone for LGBTI rights before the Colombian Special Jurisdiction for Peace". EJIL: Talk!. Retrieved 2023-01-04.
36. "Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide" Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
37. "The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols" International Committee of the Red Cross
38. Zgonec-Rožej, Miša (July 2013). . Briefing Papers. Chatham House: 16. Archived from the original on 2018-02-02. Retrieved 2019-08-01.
39. "Explained: Election Pledge on New Crimes Against Humanity Initiative" 2015-09-04 at the Wayback Machine AEGIS
40. "International Prosecutors Call for Convention on Crimes Against Humanity" The Jurist
41. Richard, Goldstone (2011). "Foreword".
42. M. Cherif Bassiouni,"Crimes Against Humanity" 2015-03-20 at the Wayback Machine The Crimes of War Project
43. Evans, Gareth, "Crimes Against Humanity and the Responsibility to Protect" January 5, 2015, at the Wayback Machine International Crisis Group
44. Cecilia Marcela Bailliet, "UN International Law Commission to Elaborate New Global Convention on Crimes Against Humanity" IntLawGrrls
45. William A. Schabas, "International Law Commission to Work on Draft Articles on Crimes Against Humanity" PhD studies in human rights
46. Murphy, Sean (February 2013). "Proposal for New Topic: Crimes Against Humanity, Working Group on the Long-Term Program of Work". International Law Commission, Sixty-fifth session. p. 2
47. "A/RES/260(III) – E – A/RES/260(III)". undocs.org. Retrieved 2019-08-28.
48. "ICD – Crimes against humanity". Asser Institute. 2013.
49. "Resolution A/HRC/RES/22/13: Situation of human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea" August 29, 2013, at the Wayback Machine Human Rights Council
50. Report of the commission of inquiry on human rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea – A/HRC/25/63, available at: . Archived from the original on 2015-04-25. Retrieved 2015-05-11.
51. Resolution 1674 (2006) February 23, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
52. "Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1970 (2011) concerning Libya". United Nations Security Council.
53. "Resolution 1970 (2011)". United Nations Security Council.
54. "Jordan, UAE, Turkey, Sudan accused of violating sanctions on Libya – U.N. report". Reuters. 2019-11-11. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
55. "Libya's Tripoli Government Blames U.A.E. for Deadly Airstrike". The Wall Street Journal. 4 July 2019. Retrieved 4 July 2019.
56. Burns, Peter, "Aspect of Crimes Against Humanity and the International Criminal Court" 2012-10-21 at the Wayback Machine International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy. p. 6.
57. "ICTY Statute" Article 5
58. Cherif Bassiouni, M. Crimes against Humanity: Historical Evolution and Contemporary Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 186
59. "ICTR Statute" Article 3
60. Cherif Bassiouni. . Archived from the original on 2006-07-18. Retrieved 2006-07-23.
61. Rome statute of the International Criminal Court Article 7: Crimes against humanity. pdf version
62. As quoted by Guy Horton in Dying Alive – A Legal Assessment of Human Rights Violations in Burma April 2005, co-Funded by The Netherlands Ministry for Development Co-Operation. See section "12.52 Crimes against humanity", p. 201. He references RSICC/C, Vol. 1 p. 360
63. Luis Moreno Ocampo (PDF). Archived from the original on 2006-02-25. Retrieved 2006-02-25.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) 9 February 2006, p. 4.
64. . Archived from the original on 2011-04-12. Retrieved 2011-04-12.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
65. International Criminal Court, 14 July 2008.. Archived from the original on 2008-07-15. Retrieved 2008-07-15.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link). Accessed 14 July 2008.
66. Judge Philippe Kirsch (President of the International Criminal Court) (PDF). Archived from the original on 2007-06-06. Retrieved 2007-09-14.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) (PDF) website ICC, 9 October 2006, p. 3.
67. Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe: Recommendation (2002) 5 November 27, 2006, at the Wayback Machine Paragraph 69.
68. Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe: Recommendation (2002) 5 November 27, 2006, at the Wayback Machine Paragraph 100.
69. "History: The Most Violent Century". www.vision.org. Retrieved 2018-06-21.
70. https://www.washingtontimes.com, The Washington Times. "A most violent century". The Washington Times. Retrieved 2023-09-18. {{cite web}}: External link in |last= (help)
71. Satter, David (2017-11-06). "100 Years of Communism—and 100 Million Dead". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2023-09-18.
72. Hobsbawm, Eric (2002-02-23). "War and peace". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-06-21.
73. Cobain, Ian (2012-10-25). "Britain favoured execution over Nuremberg trials for Nazi leaders". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2023-09-18.
74. Pronto, Arnold N. "Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1998". legal.un.org. Retrieved 2018-06-21.
75. "Crimes Against Humanity – TRIAL International". TRIAL International. Retrieved 2018-06-21.
76. Russell, Cecilia (22 January 2010). "Pair of legal heavyweights defend Goldstone". The Star. Johannesburg.
77. "UN condemns 'war crimes' in Gaza". BBC News. 16 September 2009. Retrieved 30 April 2010.
78. "Human rights council finds Palestinian armed forces to have conducted war crimes that may amount to crimes against humanity" (PDF).
79. Holmes, Oliver (28 February 2019). "UN says Israel's killings at Gaza protests may amount to war crimes". TheGuardian.com.
80. "Commission of Inquiry finds that the Israeli occupation is unlawful under international law". OHCHR.
81. Cumming-Bruce, Nick (28 February 2019). "Israelis May Have Committed Crimes Against Humanity in Gaza Protests, U.N. Says". The New York Times.
82. "Israel's Apartheid Against Palestinians". February 2022.
83. "China's treatment of Uyghurs may be crime against humanity, says UN human rights chief". the Guardian. August 31, 2022. from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
84. "Torture claims against China Uyghurs credible – UN". BBC News. August 31, 2022. from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
85. Cumming-Bruce, Nick; Ramzy, Austin (2022-08-31). "U.N. Says China May Have Committed 'Crimes Against Humanity' in Xinjiang". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 2022-09-01.
86. Oliver Holmes (19 December 2016). "Myanmar's Rohingya campaign 'may be crime against humanity'". The Guardian. from the original on 6 January 2017. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
87. "Rohingya abuse may be crimes against humanity: Amnesty". Al Jazeera. 19 December 2016.Retrieved 2023-02-21.
88. "Amnesty accuses Myanmar military of 'crimes against humanity'". BBC News. 19 December 2016. from the original on 7 October 2017. Retrieved 21 July 2018.
89. "Report of Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar". ohchr.org. 27 August 2018. from the original on 19 October 2018. Retrieved 14 August 2019.
90. "Burmese generals should stand trial for atrocities against the Rohingya". The Economist. 30 August 2018. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2 January 2022.

Further reading

Main article: Bibliography of Genocide studies

• Christopher R. Browning, "The Two Different Ways of Looking at Nazi Murder" (review of Philippe Sands, East West Street: On the Origins of "Genocide" and "Crimes Against Humanity", Knopf, 425 pp. and Christian Gerlach, The Extermination of the European Jews, Cambridge University Press, 508 pp., The New York Review of Books, vol. LXIII, no. 18 (November 24, 2016), pp. 56–58. Discusses Hersch Lauterpacht's legal concept of "crimes against humanity", contrasted with Rafael Lemkin's legal concept of "genocide". All genocides are crimes against humanity, but not all crimes against humanity are genocides; genocides require a higher standard of proof, as they entail intent to destroy a particular group.
• Macleod, Christopher (2010). "Towards a Philosophical Account of Crimes Against Humanity". European Journal of International Law. 21 (2): 281–302. doi:10.1093/ejil/chq031.
• Sadat, Leila Nadya (2013). (PDF). American Journal of International Law. 107 (2): 334–377. doi:10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.2.0334. S2CID 229167103. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 October 2014. Retrieved 11 December 2013.
• Schabas, William A. (2000). Genocide in International Law: The Crimes of Crimes. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521782623.
• (fr) Jean Albert (dir.), L'avenir de la justice pénale internationale, Institut Presage, Bruylant, 2018, 383 p. ISBN 978-2802753452

External links

 

Look up crimes against humanity in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

 

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Crimes against humanity.

 

Wikiquote has quotations related to Crimes against humanity.

• – an online video
• – a learning resource, highlighting the cases of Myanmar, Bosnia, the DRC, and Darfur
• Crimes Against Humanity – Bibliographies on the topics of the International Law Commission & International Law Seminar (UNOG Library)