fbpx
Wikipedia

1836 United States presidential election

The 1836 United States presidential election was the 13th quadrennial presidential election, held from Thursday, November 3 to Wednesday, December 7, 1836. In the third consecutive election victory for the Democratic Party, incumbent Vice President Martin Van Buren defeated four candidates fielded by the nascent Whig Party.

1836 United States presidential election

← 1832
  • November 3 – December 7, 1836
1840 →

294 members of the Electoral College
148 electoral votes needed to win
Turnout56.5%[1] 0.5 pp
 
Nominee Martin Van Buren William Henry Harrison Hugh L. White
Party Democratic Whig Whig
Alliance Anti-Masonic
Home state New York Ohio Tennessee
Running mate Richard M. Johnson Francis Granger John Tyler
Electoral vote 170 73 26
States carried 15 7 2
Popular vote 764,176 550,816 146,109
Percentage 50.8% 36.6% 9.7%

 
Nominee Daniel Webster Willie P. Mangum
Party Whig Whig
Alliance Nullifier
Home state Massachusetts North Carolina
Running mate Francis Granger John Tyler
Electoral vote 14 11
States carried 1 1
Popular vote 41,201 N/A
Percentage 2.7% N/A

1836 United States presidential election in Maine1836 United States presidential election in New Hampshire1836 United States presidential election in Massachusetts1836 United States presidential election in Rhode Island1836 United States presidential election in Connecticut1836 United States presidential election in New York1836 United States presidential election in Vermont1836 United States presidential election in New Jersey1836 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania1836 United States presidential election in Delaware1836 United States presidential election in Maryland1836 United States presidential election in Virginia1836 United States presidential election in Ohio1836 United States presidential election in Michigan1836 United States presidential election in Indiana1836 United States presidential election in Illinois1836 United States presidential election in Kentucky1836 United States presidential election in Tennessee1836 United States presidential election in North Carolina1836 United States presidential election in South Carolina1836 United States presidential election in Georgia1836 United States presidential election in Alabama1836 United States presidential election in Mississippi1836 United States presidential election in Louisiana1836 United States presidential election in Arkansas1836 United States presidential election in Missouri
Presidential election results map. Blue denotes states won by Van Buren and Johnson or Smith, pale grey-purple denotes those won by Harrison and Granger or Tyler, purple denotes those won by White/Tyler, coral pink denotes those won by Webster/Granger, and bluegrass green denotes those won by Mangum/Tyler. Numbers indicate the number of electoral votes allotted to each state.

President before election

Andrew Jackson
Democratic

Elected President

Martin Van Buren
Democratic

1837 contingent U.S. vice presidential election
February 8, 1837

52 United States senators
27 votes needed to win
 
Candidate Richard M. Johnson Francis Granger
Party Democratic Whig
Senate vote 33 16
Percentage 63.46% 30.77%

The 1835 Democratic National Convention chose a ticket of Van Buren (President Andrew Jackson's handpicked successor) and U.S. Representative Richard Mentor Johnson of Kentucky. The Whig Party, which had only recently emerged and was primarily united by opposition to Jackson, was not yet sufficiently organized to agree on a single candidate. Hoping to compel a contingent election in the House of Representatives by denying the Democrats an electoral majority, the Whigs ran multiple candidates. Most Northern and border state Whigs supported the ticket led by former Senator William Henry Harrison of Ohio, while most Southern Whigs supported the ticket led by Senator Hugh Lawson White of Tennessee. Two other Whigs, Daniel Webster and Willie Person Mangum, carried Massachusetts and South Carolina respectively on single-state tickets.

Despite facing multiple candidates, Van Buren won a majority of the electoral vote, and he won a majority of the popular vote in both the North and the South. Nonetheless, the Whig strategy came very close to success, as Van Buren won the decisive state of Pennsylvania by just over two points. As Virginia's electors voted for Van Buren but refused to vote for Johnson, Johnson fell one vote short of an electoral majority, compelling a contingent election for vice president. In that contingent election, the United States Senate elected Johnson over Harrison's running mate, Francis Granger, on the first ballot.

Van Buren was the third incumbent vice president to win election as president, an event which would not happen again until 1988, when George H. W. Bush was elected president. He is also the most recent Democrat to be elected to succeed a two-term Democratic president.[2] Harrison finished second in both the popular and electoral vote, and his strong performance helped him win the Whig nomination in the 1840 presidential election. The election of 1836 was crucial in developing the Second Party System and a stable two-party system more generally. By the end of the election, nearly every independent faction had been absorbed by either the Democrats or the Whigs.[3]

Nominations edit

Democratic Party nomination edit

1836 Democratic Party ticket
Martin Van Buren Richard M. Johnson
for President for Vice President
 
 
8th
Vice President of the United States
(1833–1837)
U.S. Representative
from Kentucky
 
Andrew Jackson, whose second term as president expired on March 4, 1837

The 1835 Democratic National Convention was held in Baltimore, Maryland, from 20 to 22 May 1835. The early date of the convention was selected by President Andrew Jackson to prevent the formation of opposition to Martin Van Buren. Twenty-two states and two territories were represented at the convention with Alabama, Illinois, and South Carolina being unrepresented. The delegate amount per state varied from Maryland having 188 delegates to cast its ten votes while Tennessee's fifteen votes were cast by one delegate.[4]

The convention saw the first credentials dispute in American history with two rival delegations from Pennsylvania claiming the state's votes. The issue was solved by seating both delegations and having them share the state's votes. An attempt to remove the two-thirds requirement for the selection of a candidate was passed by a vote of 231 to 210, but was later restored through a voice vote.[4]

Some Southerners opposed Johnson's nomination, due to his open relationship with an enslaved woman, whom he had regarded as his common-law wife. At the convention, Van Buren was nominated unanimously with all 265 delegates in favor, but the Virginia delegates supported Senator William Cabell Rives against Johnson. However, Rives got little support and Johnson was nominated with one more vote than the two-thirds requirement.[5][4]

Convention vote
Presidential vote Vice presidential vote
Martin Van Buren 265 Richard M. Johnson 178
William C. Rives 87

Whig Party nomination edit

The Whig Party emerged during the 1834 mid-term elections as the chief opposition to the Democratic Party. The party was formed from members of the National Republican Party, the Anti-Masonic Party, disaffected Jacksonians, and small remnants of the Federalist Party (people whose last political activity was with them a decade before). Some Southerners who were angered by Jackson's opposition to states' rights, including Sen. John C. Calhoun and the Nullifiers, also temporarily joined the Whig coalition.[5]

Unlike the Democrats, the Whigs did not hold a national convention. Instead, state legislatures and state conventions nominated candidates, being the reason why so many candidates from the Whig party ran in the general election. Southern Nullifiers placed Tennessee Senator Hugh Lawson White into contention for the presidency in 1834 soon after his break with Jackson. White was a moderate on the states' rights issue, which made him acceptable in the South, but not in the North. The state legislatures of Alabama and Tennessee officially nominated White. The South Carolina state legislature nominated Senator Willie Person Mangum of North Carolina. By early 1835, Massachusetts Senator Daniel Webster was building support among Northern Whigs. Both Webster and White used Senate debates to establish their positions on the issues of the day, as newspapers carried the text of their speeches nationwide. The Pennsylvania legislature nominated popular former general William Henry Harrison, who had led American forces at the Battle of Tippecanoe. The Whigs hoped that Harrison's reputation as a military hero could win voter support. Harrison soon displaced Webster as the preferred candidate of Northern Whigs. State legislatures, particularly in larger states, also nominated various vice presidential candidates.[5]

Despite multiple candidates, there was only one Whig ticket in each state. The Whigs ended up with two main tickets: William Henry Harrison for president and Francis Granger for vice president in the North and Kentucky, and Hugh Lawson White for president and John Tyler for vice president in the middle and lower South. In Massachusetts, the ticket was Daniel Webster for president and Granger for vice president. In South Carolina, the ticket was Mangum for president and Tyler for vice president. In Maryland, it was Harrison and Tyler. Of the four Whig presidential candidates, only Harrison was on the ballot in enough states for it to be mathematically possible for him to win a majority in the Electoral College, and even then, it would have required him to win Van Buren's home state of New York.[5]

Anti-Masonic Party nomination edit

After the negative views of Freemasonry among a large segment of the public began to wane in the mid-1830s, the Anti-Masonic Party began to disintegrate. Some of its members began moving to the Whig Party, which had a broader issue base than the Anti-Masons. The Whigs were also regarded as a better alternative to the Democrats.

A state convention for the Anti-Masonic Party was held in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, from December 14 to 17, 1835, to choose presidential electors for the 1836 election. The convention unanimously nominated William Henry Harrison for president and Francis Granger for vice president. The Vermont state Anti-Masonic convention followed suit on February 24, 1836. Anti-Masonic leaders were unable to obtain assurance from Harrison that he was not a Mason, so they called a national convention. The second national Anti-Masonic nominating convention was held in Philadelphia on May 4, 1836. The meeting was divisive, but a majority of the delegates officially stated that the party was not sponsoring a national ticket for the presidential election of 1836 and proposed a meeting in 1837 to discuss the future of the party.

Nullifier Party nomination edit

The Nullifier Party had also begun to decline sharply since the previous election, after it became clear that the doctrine of nullification lacked sufficient support outside of the party's political base of South Carolina to ever make the Nullifiers more than a fringe party nationwide. Many party members began to drift towards the Democratic Party, but there was no question of the party endorsing Van Buren's bid for the presidency, as he and Calhoun were sworn enemies. Seeing little point in running their own ticket, Calhoun pushed the party into backing the White/Tyler ticket, as White had previously sided against Jackson during the Nullification Crisis.

General election edit

Campaign edit

 
Results by county explicitly indicating the percentage of the winning candidate in each county. Shades of blue are for Van Buren (Democratic), shades of orange are for Harrison (Whig), shades of green are for White (Whig), and shades of red are for Webster (Whig).

In the aftermath of the Nat Turner slave rebellion and other events, slavery emerged as an increasingly prominent political issue. Calhoun attacked Van Buren, saying that he could not be trusted to protect Southern interests and accusing the sitting Vice President of affiliating with abolitionists.[5] Van Buren defeated Harrison by a margin of 51.4% to 48.6% in the North, and he defeated White by a similar margin of 50.7% to 49.3% in the South.

Disputes edit

A dispute similar to that of Indiana in 1817 and Missouri in 1821 arose during the counting of the electoral votes. Michigan only became a state on January 26, 1837, and had cast its electoral votes for president before that date. Anticipating a challenge to the results, Congress resolved on February 4, 1837, that during the counting four days later the final tally would be read twice, once with Michigan and once without Michigan. The counting proceeded in accordance with the resolution. The dispute had no bearing on the final result: either way Van Buren was elected, and either way no candidate had a majority for vice-president.[6]

Results edit

The Whigs' strategy narrowly failed to prevent Van Buren's victory in the Electoral College, though he earned a somewhat lower share of the popular vote and fewer electoral votes than Andrew Jackson had in either of the previous two elections.

The key state in this election was ultimately Pennsylvania, which Van Buren won from Harrison with a narrow majority of just 4,222 votes. Had Harrison won the state, Van Buren would have been left eight votes short of an Electoral College majority - despite receiving a majority (50.48%) in the popular vote - and the Whig goal to force the election into the House of Representatives (in accordance with the Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution) would have succeeded.

In a contingent election, the House would have been required to choose between Van Buren, Harrison, and White as the three candidates with the most electoral votes. Jacksonians controlled enough state delegations (14 out of 26) and enough Senate seats (31 out of 52) to win both the presidency and the vice-presidency in a contingent election.

This was the last election in which the Democrats won Connecticut, Rhode Island, and North Carolina until 1852. This was also the only election where South Carolina voted for the Whigs, and the last time it voted against the Democrats until 1868. It was also the last time that a Democrat was elected to the U.S. presidency succeeding a Democrat who had served two terms as U.S. president.[7]

Contingent election for Vice-President edit

In an unusual turn of events, Virginia's 23 electors, who were all pledged to Van Buren and his running mate Richard Mentor Johnson, became faithless electors due to dissention related to Johnson's interracial relationship with a slave[8] and refused to vote for Johnson, instead casting their vice-presidential votes for former South Carolina senator William Smith.

This left Johnson one electoral vote short of an Electoral College majority, forcing a contingent election in the Senate decided between the top two vote recipients, Johnson and Francis Granger. Since no vice presidential candidate received a majority of electoral votes, and for the only time in American history, the Senate decided a vice presidential race, and Johnson was elected vice president.[9]

 

Presidential candidate Party Home state Popular vote(a) Electoral vote
Count Percentage
Martin Van Buren Democratic New York 764,176 50.83% 170
William Henry Harrison Whig Ohio 550,816 36.63% 73
Hugh Lawson White Whig Tennessee 146,107 9.72% 26
Daniel Webster Whig Massachusetts 41,201 2.74% 14
Willie Person Mangum Whig North Carolina (b) 11
Other 1,234 0.08% 0
Total 1,503,534 100.0% 294
Needed to win 148

Source (Popular Vote): Leip, David. "1836 Presidential Election Results". Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved July 27, 2005. Source (Electoral Vote): "Electoral College Box Scores 1789–1996". National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved July 31, 2005.

(a) The popular vote figures exclude South Carolina where the electors were chosen by the state legislature rather than by popular vote.
(b) Mangum received his electoral votes from South Carolina where the electors were chosen by the state legislatures rather than by popular vote.

Popular vote
Van Buren
50.83%
Harrison
36.63%
White
9.72%
Webster
2.74%
Others
0.08%
Electoral vote
Van Buren
57.82%
Harrison
24.83%
White
8.84%
Webster
4.76%
Mangum
3.74%
Vice presidential candidate Party State Electoral vote
Richard M. Johnson Democratic Kentucky 147
Francis Granger Whig New York 77
John Tyler Whig Virginia 47
William Smith Democratic South Carolina 23
Total 294
Needed to win 148

Source: "Electoral College Box Scores 1789–1996". National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved July 31, 2005.

Geography of results edit

Cartographic gallery edit

Results by state edit

Source: Data from Walter Dean Burnham, Presidential ballots, 1836-1892 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1955) pp 247–57.

States/districts won by Van Buren/Johnson
States/districts won by a Whig candidate
Martin Van Buren
Democratic
William H. Harrison
Whig
Hugh L. White
Whig
Daniel Webster
Whig
Willie Person Mangum
Whig
Margin Total
State electoral
votes
Votes cast % electoral
votes
Votes cast % electoral
votes
Votes cast % electoral
votes
Votes cast % electoral
votes
electoral
votes
# % #
Alabama 7 20,638 55.34 7 no ballots 16,658 44.66 0 no ballots no ballots 3,980 10.68 37,296 AL
Arkansas 3 2,380 64.08 3 no ballots 1,334 35.92 0 no ballots no ballots 1,046 28.16 3,714 AR
Connecticut 8 19,294 50.65 8 18,799 49.35 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 495 1.30 38,093 CT
Delaware 3 4,154 46.70 0 4,736 53.24 3 no ballots no ballots no ballots -582 -6.54 8,895 DE
Georgia 11 22,778 48.20 0 no ballots 24,481 51.80 11 no ballots no ballots -1,703 -3.60 47,259 GA
Illinois 5 18,369 54.69 5 15,220 45.31 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 3,149 9.38 33,589 IL
Indiana 9 32,478 44.03 0 41,281 55.97 9 no ballots no ballots no ballots -8,803 -11.94 73,759 IN
Kentucky 15 33,229 47.41 0 36,861 52.59 15 no ballots no ballots no ballots -3,632 -5.18 70,090 KY
Louisiana 5 3,842 51.74 5 no ballots 3,583 48.26 0 no ballots no ballots 259 3.48 7,425 LA
Maine 10 22,825 58.92 10 14,803 38.21 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 8,022 20.71 38,740 ME
Maryland 10 22,267 46.27 0 25,852 53.73 10 no ballots no ballots no ballots -3,585 -7.46 48,119 MD
Massachusetts 14 33,486 44.81 0 no ballots no ballots 41,201 55.13 14 no ballots -7,715 -10.32 74,687 MA
Michigan 3 7,122 56.22 3 5,545 43.78 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 1,577 12.44 12,667 MI
Mississippi 4 10,297 51.28 4 no ballots 9,782 48.72 0 no ballots no ballots 515 2.56 20,079 MS
Missouri 4 10,995 59.98 4 no ballots 7,337 40.02 0 no ballots no ballots 3,658 19.96 18,332 MO
New Hampshire 7 18,697 75.01 7 6,228 24.99 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 12,469 50.02 24,925 NH
New Jersey 8 25,592 49.47 0 26,137 50.53 8 no ballots no ballots no ballots -545 -1.06 51,729 NJ
New York 42 166,795 54.63 42 138,548 45.37 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 28,247 9.26 305,343 NY
North Carolina 15 26,631 53.10 15 no ballots 23,521 46.90 0 no ballots no ballots 3,110 6.20 50,153 NC
Ohio 21 96,238 47.56 0 104,958 51.87 21 no ballots no ballots no ballots -8,720 -4.31 202,333 OH
Pennsylvania 30 91,457 51.18 30 87,235 48.82 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 4,222 2.36 178,692 PA
Rhode Island 4 2,964 52.24 4 2,710 47.76 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 254 4.48 5,674 RI
South Carolina 11 no popular vote no popular vote no popular vote no popular vote 11 - - 0 SC
Tennessee 15 26,170 42.08 0 no ballots 36,027 57.92 15 no ballots no ballots -9,857 -15.84 62,197 TN
Vermont 7 14,037 40.07 0 20,994 59.93 7 no ballots no ballots no ballots -6,957 -19.86 35,031 VT
Virginia 23 30,556 56.64 23 no ballots 23,384 43.35 0 no ballots no ballots 7,172 13.29 53,945 VA
TOTALS: 294 763,291 50.79 170 549,907 36.59 73 146,107 9.72 26 41,201 2.74 14 11 213,384 14.20 1,502,811 US
TO WIN: 148

Close states edit

States where the margin of victory was under 5%:

  1. New Jersey 1.06% (545 votes)
  2. Connecticut 1.3% (495 votes)
  3. Pennsylvania 2.36% (4,222 votes) (tipping point state for a Van Buren victory)
  4. Mississippi 2.56% (515 votes)
  5. Louisiana 3.48% (259 votes)
  6. Georgia 3.6% (1,703 votes)
  7. Ohio 4.31% (8,720 votes)
  8. Rhode Island 4.48% (254 votes)

States where the margin of victory was under 10%:

  1. Kentucky 5.18% (3,632 votes)
  2. North Carolina 6.2% (3,110 votes)
  3. Delaware 6.54% (582 votes)
  4. Maryland 7.46% (3,585 votes)
  5. New York 9.26% (28,247 votes) (tipping point state for a Harrison victory)
  6. Illinois 9.38% (3,149 votes)

Breakdown by ticket edit

Candidate Total Martin Van Buren
Democratic
William H. Harrison
Whig
Hugh L. White
Whig
Daniel Webster
Whig
Willie P. Mangum
Whig
Electoral Votes for President 294 170 73 26 14 11
For Vice President, Richard Mentor Johnson 147 147        
For Vice President, Francis Granger 77   63   14  
For Vice President, John Tyler 47   10 26   11
For Vice President, William Smith 23 23        

1837 contingent election edit

Since no candidate for vice president received a majority of the electoral votes, the U.S. Senate held a contingent election in which the top two electoral vote recipients, Richard Johnson and Francis Granger, were the candidates. On February 8, 1837, Johnson was elected on the first ballot by a vote of 33 to 16; the vote proceeded largely along party lines, albeit with three Whigs voting for Johnson, one Democrat voting for Granger, and three abstentions (Hugh L. White declined to vote out of respect for his own running-mate, John Tyler, while the two Nullifier Party senators refused to back either candidate). This is the only time that the Senate has exercised this power.[10]

1837 Contingent United States vice presidential election
February 8, 1837
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Richard M. Johnson 33 63.46%
Whig Francis Granger 16 30.77%
    Not voting 3 5.77%
Total membership 52 100
Votes necessary 27 >50
Members voting for:
Johnson Granger

 Thomas H. Benton of Missouri
 John Black of Mississippi
 Bedford Brown of North Carolina
 James Buchanan of Pennsylvania
 Alfred Cuthbert of Georgia
 Judah Dana of Maine
 William Lee D. Ewing of Illinois
 William S. Fulton of Arkansas
 Felix Grundy of Tennessee
 William Hendricks of Indiana
 Henry Hubbard of New Hampshire
 William R. King of Alabama
 John P. King of Georgia
 Lewis F. Linn of Missouri
 Lucius Lyon of Michigan
 Samuel McKean of Pennsylvania
 Gabriel Moore of Alabama
 Thomas Morris of Ohio
 Alexandre Mouton of Louisiana
 Robert C. Nicholas of Louisiana
 John M. Niles of Connecticut
 John Norvell of Michigan
 John Page of New Hampshire
 Richard E. Parker of Virginia
 William C. Rives of Virginia
 John M. Robinson of Illinois
 John Ruggles of Maine
 Ambrose H. Sevier of Arkansas
 Robert Strange of North Carolina
 Nathaniel P. Tallmadge of New York
 John Tipton of Indiana
 Robert J. Walker of Mississippi
 Silas Wright of New York

 Richard H. Bayard of Delaware
 Henry Clay of Kentucky
 Thomas Clayton of Delaware
 John J. Crittenden of Kentucky
 John Davis of Massachusetts
 Thomas Ewing of Ohio
 Joseph Kent of Maryland
 Nehemiah R. Knight of Rhode Island
 Samuel Prentiss of Vermont
 Asher Robbins of Rhode Island
 Samuel L. Southard of New Jersey
 John Selby Spence of Maryland
 Benjamin Swift of Vermont
 Gideon Tomlinson of Connecticut
 Garret D. Wall of New Jersey
 Daniel Webster of Massachusetts

Members not voting:

 John C. Calhoun of South Carolina
 William C. Preston of South Carolina
 Hugh L. White of Tennessee

Sources: [11][12]

Electoral college selection edit

Method of choosing electors State(s)
Each Elector appointed by state legislature South Carolina
Each Elector chosen by voters statewide (all other States)

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ "National General Election VEP Turnout Rates, 1789-Present". United States Election Project. CQ Press.
  2. ^ Murse, Tom (December 16, 2020). "Last Time Consecutive Democratic Presidents Were Elected". ThoughtCo. You'd have to go back even further in history to find the most recent instance of a Democrat being elected to succeed a two-term president from the same party. The last time that happened was in 1836 when voters elected Martin Van Buren to follow Andrew Jackson.
  3. ^ Cole, Donald B. (1984). Martin Van Buren and the American Political System. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 279. ISBN 0-691-04715-4. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
  4. ^ a b c National Party Conventions, 1831-1976. Congressional Quarterly. 1979.
  5. ^ a b c d e Deskins, Donald Richard; Walton, Hanes; Puckett, Sherman (2010). Presidential Elections, 1789-2008: County, State, and National Mapping of Election Data. University of Michigan Press. pp. 106–107.
  6. ^ United States Congress (1837). Senate Journal. 24th Congress, 2nd Session, February 4. pp. 203–204. from the original on April 4, 2015. Retrieved August 20, 2006.
  7. ^ Murse, Tom (December 16, 2020). . ThoughtCo. Archived from the original on June 3, 2021. Retrieved July 6, 2021.
  8. ^ Burke, Window To The Past
  9. ^ Norton, Mary Beth (2015). A People and a Nation: A History of the United States (10th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing. p. 344.
  10. ^ "The Senate Elects a Vice President". Washington, D.C.: Office of the Secretary of the Senate. Retrieved August 11, 2019.
  11. ^ "Cong. Globe, 24th Cong., 2nd Sess. 166(1837)". A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774–1875. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress. Retrieved August 8, 2019.
  12. ^ "24th Congress Senate Vote 334 (1837)". voteview.com. Los Angeles, California: UCLA Department of Political Science and Social Science Computing. Retrieved August 8, 2019.

Further reading edit

  • Brown, Thomas. "The miscegenation of Richard Mentor Johnson as an issue in the national election campaign of 1835-1836." Civil War History 39.1 (1993): 5-30. online
  • Cheathem, Mark. R. The Coming of Democracy: Presidential Campaigning in the Age of Jackson (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018)
  • Ershkowitz, Herbert B. "The Election of 1836." in American Presidential Campaigns and Elections;; (Routledge, 2020) pp. 270-288.
  • Hoffmann, William S. "The Election of 1836 in North Carolina." North Carolina Historical Review 32.1 (1955): 31–51. online
  • McCormick, Richard P. "Was There a" Whig Strategy" in 1836?." Journal of the Early Republic 4.1 (1984): 47-70. online
  • Shade, William G. "'The Most Delicate and Exciting Topics': Martin Van Buren, Slavery, and the Election of 1836." Journal of the Early Republic 18.3 (1998): 459-484 online.
  • Silbey, Joel H. "Election of 1836," in Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. and Fred L. Israel, eds. History of American Presidential Elections (4 vols., 1971), I, 577–64, history plus primary sources
  • Towers, Frank. "The Rise of the Whig Party." in A Companion to the Era of Andrew Jackson (2013): 328–347.

External links edit

  • "A Historical Analysis of the Electoral College". The Green Papers. Retrieved March 20, 2005.
  • Presidential Election of 1836: A Resource Guide from the Library of Congress
  • Election of 1836 in Counting the Votes March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine

1836, united, states, presidential, election, 13th, quadrennial, presidential, election, held, from, thursday, november, wednesday, december, 1836, third, consecutive, election, victory, democratic, party, incumbent, vice, president, martin, buren, defeated, f. The 1836 United States presidential election was the 13th quadrennial presidential election held from Thursday November 3 to Wednesday December 7 1836 In the third consecutive election victory for the Democratic Party incumbent Vice President Martin Van Buren defeated four candidates fielded by the nascent Whig Party 1836 United States presidential election 1832 November 3 December 7 1836 1840 294 members of the Electoral College148 electoral votes needed to winTurnout56 5 1 0 5 pp Nominee Martin Van Buren William Henry Harrison Hugh L WhiteParty Democratic Whig WhigAlliance Anti MasonicHome state New York Ohio TennesseeRunning mate Richard M Johnson Francis Granger John TylerElectoral vote 170 73 26States carried 15 7 2Popular vote 764 176 550 816 146 109Percentage 50 8 36 6 9 7 Nominee Daniel Webster Willie P MangumParty Whig WhigAlliance NullifierHome state Massachusetts North CarolinaRunning mate Francis Granger John TylerElectoral vote 14 11States carried 1 1Popular vote 41 201 N APercentage 2 7 N APresidential election results map Blue denotes states won by Van Buren and Johnson or Smith pale grey purple denotes those won by Harrison and Granger or Tyler purple denotes those won by White Tyler coral pink denotes those won by Webster Granger and bluegrass green denotes those won by Mangum Tyler Numbers indicate the number of electoral votes allotted to each state President before electionAndrew JacksonDemocratic Elected President Martin Van BurenDemocratic1837 contingent U S vice presidential electionFebruary 8 183752 United States senators27 votes needed to win Candidate Richard M Johnson Francis GrangerParty Democratic WhigSenate vote 33 16Percentage 63 46 30 77 The 1835 Democratic National Convention chose a ticket of Van Buren President Andrew Jackson s handpicked successor and U S Representative Richard Mentor Johnson of Kentucky The Whig Party which had only recently emerged and was primarily united by opposition to Jackson was not yet sufficiently organized to agree on a single candidate Hoping to compel a contingent election in the House of Representatives by denying the Democrats an electoral majority the Whigs ran multiple candidates Most Northern and border state Whigs supported the ticket led by former Senator William Henry Harrison of Ohio while most Southern Whigs supported the ticket led by Senator Hugh Lawson White of Tennessee Two other Whigs Daniel Webster and Willie Person Mangum carried Massachusetts and South Carolina respectively on single state tickets Despite facing multiple candidates Van Buren won a majority of the electoral vote and he won a majority of the popular vote in both the North and the South Nonetheless the Whig strategy came very close to success as Van Buren won the decisive state of Pennsylvania by just over two points As Virginia s electors voted for Van Buren but refused to vote for Johnson Johnson fell one vote short of an electoral majority compelling a contingent election for vice president In that contingent election the United States Senate elected Johnson over Harrison s running mate Francis Granger on the first ballot Van Buren was the third incumbent vice president to win election as president an event which would not happen again until 1988 when George H W Bush was elected president He is also the most recent Democrat to be elected to succeed a two term Democratic president 2 Harrison finished second in both the popular and electoral vote and his strong performance helped him win the Whig nomination in the 1840 presidential election The election of 1836 was crucial in developing the Second Party System and a stable two party system more generally By the end of the election nearly every independent faction had been absorbed by either the Democrats or the Whigs 3 Contents 1 Nominations 1 1 Democratic Party nomination 1 2 Whig Party nomination 1 3 Anti Masonic Party nomination 1 4 Nullifier Party nomination 2 General election 2 1 Campaign 2 2 Disputes 2 3 Results 2 4 Contingent election for Vice President 2 5 Geography of results 2 5 1 Cartographic gallery 3 Results by state 3 1 Close states 3 2 Breakdown by ticket 4 1837 contingent election 5 Electoral college selection 6 See also 7 References 8 Further reading 9 External linksNominations editDemocratic Party nomination edit Main article 1835 Democratic National Convention 1836 Democratic Party ticketMartin Van Buren Richard M Johnsonfor President for Vice President nbsp nbsp 8thVice President of the United States 1833 1837 U S Representativefrom Kentucky nbsp Andrew Jackson whose second term as president expired on March 4 1837The 1835 Democratic National Convention was held in Baltimore Maryland from 20 to 22 May 1835 The early date of the convention was selected by President Andrew Jackson to prevent the formation of opposition to Martin Van Buren Twenty two states and two territories were represented at the convention with Alabama Illinois and South Carolina being unrepresented The delegate amount per state varied from Maryland having 188 delegates to cast its ten votes while Tennessee s fifteen votes were cast by one delegate 4 The convention saw the first credentials dispute in American history with two rival delegations from Pennsylvania claiming the state s votes The issue was solved by seating both delegations and having them share the state s votes An attempt to remove the two thirds requirement for the selection of a candidate was passed by a vote of 231 to 210 but was later restored through a voice vote 4 Some Southerners opposed Johnson s nomination due to his open relationship with an enslaved woman whom he had regarded as his common law wife At the convention Van Buren was nominated unanimously with all 265 delegates in favor but the Virginia delegates supported Senator William Cabell Rives against Johnson However Rives got little support and Johnson was nominated with one more vote than the two thirds requirement 5 4 Convention vote Presidential vote Vice presidential voteMartin Van Buren 265 Richard M Johnson 178William C Rives 87Whig Party nomination edit Whig presidential candidates nbsp William Henry HarrisonFormer U S Senator from Ohio nbsp Daniel WebsterU S Senator from Massachusetts nbsp Hugh L WhiteU S Senator from Tennessee nbsp Willie Person MangumU S Senator from North CarolinaWhig vice presidential candidates nbsp Francis GrangerU S Representative from New York nbsp John TylerU S Senator from VirginiaThe Whig Party emerged during the 1834 mid term elections as the chief opposition to the Democratic Party The party was formed from members of the National Republican Party the Anti Masonic Party disaffected Jacksonians and small remnants of the Federalist Party people whose last political activity was with them a decade before Some Southerners who were angered by Jackson s opposition to states rights including Sen John C Calhoun and the Nullifiers also temporarily joined the Whig coalition 5 Unlike the Democrats the Whigs did not hold a national convention Instead state legislatures and state conventions nominated candidates being the reason why so many candidates from the Whig party ran in the general election Southern Nullifiers placed Tennessee Senator Hugh Lawson White into contention for the presidency in 1834 soon after his break with Jackson White was a moderate on the states rights issue which made him acceptable in the South but not in the North The state legislatures of Alabama and Tennessee officially nominated White The South Carolina state legislature nominated Senator Willie Person Mangum of North Carolina By early 1835 Massachusetts Senator Daniel Webster was building support among Northern Whigs Both Webster and White used Senate debates to establish their positions on the issues of the day as newspapers carried the text of their speeches nationwide The Pennsylvania legislature nominated popular former general William Henry Harrison who had led American forces at the Battle of Tippecanoe The Whigs hoped that Harrison s reputation as a military hero could win voter support Harrison soon displaced Webster as the preferred candidate of Northern Whigs State legislatures particularly in larger states also nominated various vice presidential candidates 5 Despite multiple candidates there was only one Whig ticket in each state The Whigs ended up with two main tickets William Henry Harrison for president and Francis Granger for vice president in the North and Kentucky and Hugh Lawson White for president and John Tyler for vice president in the middle and lower South In Massachusetts the ticket was Daniel Webster for president and Granger for vice president In South Carolina the ticket was Mangum for president and Tyler for vice president In Maryland it was Harrison and Tyler Of the four Whig presidential candidates only Harrison was on the ballot in enough states for it to be mathematically possible for him to win a majority in the Electoral College and even then it would have required him to win Van Buren s home state of New York 5 Anti Masonic Party nomination edit After the negative views of Freemasonry among a large segment of the public began to wane in the mid 1830s the Anti Masonic Party began to disintegrate Some of its members began moving to the Whig Party which had a broader issue base than the Anti Masons The Whigs were also regarded as a better alternative to the Democrats A state convention for the Anti Masonic Party was held in Harrisburg Pennsylvania from December 14 to 17 1835 to choose presidential electors for the 1836 election The convention unanimously nominated William Henry Harrison for president and Francis Granger for vice president The Vermont state Anti Masonic convention followed suit on February 24 1836 Anti Masonic leaders were unable to obtain assurance from Harrison that he was not a Mason so they called a national convention The second national Anti Masonic nominating convention was held in Philadelphia on May 4 1836 The meeting was divisive but a majority of the delegates officially stated that the party was not sponsoring a national ticket for the presidential election of 1836 and proposed a meeting in 1837 to discuss the future of the party Nullifier Party nomination edit The Nullifier Party had also begun to decline sharply since the previous election after it became clear that the doctrine of nullification lacked sufficient support outside of the party s political base of South Carolina to ever make the Nullifiers more than a fringe party nationwide Many party members began to drift towards the Democratic Party but there was no question of the party endorsing Van Buren s bid for the presidency as he and Calhoun were sworn enemies Seeing little point in running their own ticket Calhoun pushed the party into backing the White Tyler ticket as White had previously sided against Jackson during the Nullification Crisis General election editCampaign edit nbsp Results by county explicitly indicating the percentage of the winning candidate in each county Shades of blue are for Van Buren Democratic shades of orange are for Harrison Whig shades of green are for White Whig and shades of red are for Webster Whig In the aftermath of the Nat Turner slave rebellion and other events slavery emerged as an increasingly prominent political issue Calhoun attacked Van Buren saying that he could not be trusted to protect Southern interests and accusing the sitting Vice President of affiliating with abolitionists 5 Van Buren defeated Harrison by a margin of 51 4 to 48 6 in the North and he defeated White by a similar margin of 50 7 to 49 3 in the South Disputes edit A dispute similar to that of Indiana in 1817 and Missouri in 1821 arose during the counting of the electoral votes Michigan only became a state on January 26 1837 and had cast its electoral votes for president before that date Anticipating a challenge to the results Congress resolved on February 4 1837 that during the counting four days later the final tally would be read twice once with Michigan and once without Michigan The counting proceeded in accordance with the resolution The dispute had no bearing on the final result either way Van Buren was elected and either way no candidate had a majority for vice president 6 Results edit The Whigs strategy narrowly failed to prevent Van Buren s victory in the Electoral College though he earned a somewhat lower share of the popular vote and fewer electoral votes than Andrew Jackson had in either of the previous two elections The key state in this election was ultimately Pennsylvania which Van Buren won from Harrison with a narrow majority of just 4 222 votes Had Harrison won the state Van Buren would have been left eight votes short of an Electoral College majority despite receiving a majority 50 48 in the popular vote and the Whig goal to force the election into the House of Representatives in accordance with the Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution would have succeeded In a contingent election the House would have been required to choose between Van Buren Harrison and White as the three candidates with the most electoral votes Jacksonians controlled enough state delegations 14 out of 26 and enough Senate seats 31 out of 52 to win both the presidency and the vice presidency in a contingent election This was the last election in which the Democrats won Connecticut Rhode Island and North Carolina until 1852 This was also the only election where South Carolina voted for the Whigs and the last time it voted against the Democrats until 1868 It was also the last time that a Democrat was elected to the U S presidency succeeding a Democrat who had served two terms as U S president 7 Contingent election for Vice President edit In an unusual turn of events Virginia s 23 electors who were all pledged to Van Buren and his running mate Richard Mentor Johnson became faithless electors due to dissention related to Johnson s interracial relationship with a slave 8 and refused to vote for Johnson instead casting their vice presidential votes for former South Carolina senator William Smith This left Johnson one electoral vote short of an Electoral College majority forcing a contingent election in the Senate decided between the top two vote recipients Johnson and Francis Granger Since no vice presidential candidate received a majority of electoral votes and for the only time in American history the Senate decided a vice presidential race and Johnson was elected vice president 9 nbsp Presidential candidate Party Home state Popular vote a Electoral voteCount PercentageMartin Van Buren Democratic New York 764 176 50 83 170William Henry Harrison Whig Ohio 550 816 36 63 73Hugh Lawson White Whig Tennessee 146 107 9 72 26Daniel Webster Whig Massachusetts 41 201 2 74 14Willie Person Mangum Whig North Carolina b 11Other 1 234 0 08 0Total 1 503 534 100 0 294Needed to win 148Source Popular Vote Leip David 1836 Presidential Election Results Dave Leip s Atlas of U S Presidential Elections Retrieved July 27 2005 Source Electoral Vote Electoral College Box Scores 1789 1996 National Archives and Records Administration Retrieved July 31 2005 a The popular vote figures exclude South Carolina where the electors were chosen by the state legislature rather than by popular vote b Mangum received his electoral votes from South Carolina where the electors were chosen by the state legislatures rather than by popular vote Popular voteVan Buren 50 83 Harrison 36 63 White 9 72 Webster 2 74 Others 0 08 Electoral voteVan Buren 57 82 Harrison 24 83 White 8 84 Webster 4 76 Mangum 3 74 Vice presidential candidate Party State Electoral voteRichard M Johnson Democratic Kentucky 147Francis Granger Whig New York 77John Tyler Whig Virginia 47William Smith Democratic South Carolina 23Total 294Needed to win 148Source Electoral College Box Scores 1789 1996 National Archives and Records Administration Retrieved July 31 2005 Geography of results edit Cartographic gallery edit nbsp Map of presidential election results by county shaded according to winning candidate s percentage of the vote nbsp Map of Democratic presidential election results by county nbsp Map of Harrison Whig presidential election results by county nbsp Map of White Whig presidential election results by county nbsp Map of Webster Whig presidential election results by countyResults by state editSource Data from Walter Dean Burnham Presidential ballots 1836 1892 Johns Hopkins University Press 1955 pp 247 57 States districts won by Van Buren JohnsonStates districts won by a Whig candidateMartin Van BurenDemocratic William H HarrisonWhig Hugh L WhiteWhig Daniel WebsterWhig Willie Person MangumWhig Margin TotalState electoralvotes Votes cast electoralvotes Votes cast electoralvotes Votes cast electoralvotes Votes cast electoralvotes electoralvotes Alabama 7 20 638 55 34 7 no ballots 16 658 44 66 0 no ballots no ballots 3 980 10 68 37 296 ALArkansas 3 2 380 64 08 3 no ballots 1 334 35 92 0 no ballots no ballots 1 046 28 16 3 714 ARConnecticut 8 19 294 50 65 8 18 799 49 35 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 495 1 30 38 093 CTDelaware 3 4 154 46 70 0 4 736 53 24 3 no ballots no ballots no ballots 582 6 54 8 895 DEGeorgia 11 22 778 48 20 0 no ballots 24 481 51 80 11 no ballots no ballots 1 703 3 60 47 259 GAIllinois 5 18 369 54 69 5 15 220 45 31 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 3 149 9 38 33 589 ILIndiana 9 32 478 44 03 0 41 281 55 97 9 no ballots no ballots no ballots 8 803 11 94 73 759 INKentucky 15 33 229 47 41 0 36 861 52 59 15 no ballots no ballots no ballots 3 632 5 18 70 090 KYLouisiana 5 3 842 51 74 5 no ballots 3 583 48 26 0 no ballots no ballots 259 3 48 7 425 LAMaine 10 22 825 58 92 10 14 803 38 21 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 8 022 20 71 38 740 MEMaryland 10 22 267 46 27 0 25 852 53 73 10 no ballots no ballots no ballots 3 585 7 46 48 119 MDMassachusetts 14 33 486 44 81 0 no ballots no ballots 41 201 55 13 14 no ballots 7 715 10 32 74 687 MAMichigan 3 7 122 56 22 3 5 545 43 78 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 1 577 12 44 12 667 MIMississippi 4 10 297 51 28 4 no ballots 9 782 48 72 0 no ballots no ballots 515 2 56 20 079 MSMissouri 4 10 995 59 98 4 no ballots 7 337 40 02 0 no ballots no ballots 3 658 19 96 18 332 MONew Hampshire 7 18 697 75 01 7 6 228 24 99 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 12 469 50 02 24 925 NHNew Jersey 8 25 592 49 47 0 26 137 50 53 8 no ballots no ballots no ballots 545 1 06 51 729 NJNew York 42 166 795 54 63 42 138 548 45 37 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 28 247 9 26 305 343 NYNorth Carolina 15 26 631 53 10 15 no ballots 23 521 46 90 0 no ballots no ballots 3 110 6 20 50 153 NCOhio 21 96 238 47 56 0 104 958 51 87 21 no ballots no ballots no ballots 8 720 4 31 202 333 OHPennsylvania 30 91 457 51 18 30 87 235 48 82 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 4 222 2 36 178 692 PARhode Island 4 2 964 52 24 4 2 710 47 76 0 no ballots no ballots no ballots 254 4 48 5 674 RISouth Carolina 11 no popular vote no popular vote no popular vote no popular vote 11 0 SCTennessee 15 26 170 42 08 0 no ballots 36 027 57 92 15 no ballots no ballots 9 857 15 84 62 197 TNVermont 7 14 037 40 07 0 20 994 59 93 7 no ballots no ballots no ballots 6 957 19 86 35 031 VTVirginia 23 30 556 56 64 23 no ballots 23 384 43 35 0 no ballots no ballots 7 172 13 29 53 945 VATOTALS 294 763 291 50 79 170 549 907 36 59 73 146 107 9 72 26 41 201 2 74 14 11 213 384 14 20 1 502 811 USTO WIN 148 Close states edit States where the margin of victory was under 5 New Jersey 1 06 545 votes Connecticut 1 3 495 votes Pennsylvania 2 36 4 222 votes tipping point state for a Van Buren victory Mississippi 2 56 515 votes Louisiana 3 48 259 votes Georgia 3 6 1 703 votes Ohio 4 31 8 720 votes Rhode Island 4 48 254 votes States where the margin of victory was under 10 Kentucky 5 18 3 632 votes North Carolina 6 2 3 110 votes Delaware 6 54 582 votes Maryland 7 46 3 585 votes New York 9 26 28 247 votes tipping point state for a Harrison victory Illinois 9 38 3 149 votes Breakdown by ticket edit Candidate Total Martin Van BurenDemocratic William H HarrisonWhig Hugh L WhiteWhig Daniel WebsterWhig Willie P MangumWhigElectoral Votes for President 294 170 73 26 14 11For Vice President Richard Mentor Johnson 147 147 For Vice President Francis Granger 77 63 14 For Vice President John Tyler 47 10 26 11For Vice President William Smith 23 23 1837 contingent election editSince no candidate for vice president received a majority of the electoral votes the U S Senate held a contingent election in which the top two electoral vote recipients Richard Johnson and Francis Granger were the candidates On February 8 1837 Johnson was elected on the first ballot by a vote of 33 to 16 the vote proceeded largely along party lines albeit with three Whigs voting for Johnson one Democrat voting for Granger and three abstentions Hugh L White declined to vote out of respect for his own running mate John Tyler while the two Nullifier Party senators refused to back either candidate This is the only time that the Senate has exercised this power 10 1837 Contingent United States vice presidential election February 8 1837Party Candidate Votes Democratic Richard M Johnson 33 63 46 Whig Francis Granger 16 30 77 Not voting 3 5 77 Total membership 52 100Votes necessary 27 gt 50Members voting for Johnson Granger Thomas H Benton of Missouri John Black of Mississippi Bedford Brown of North Carolina James Buchanan of Pennsylvania Alfred Cuthbert of Georgia Judah Dana of Maine William Lee D Ewing of Illinois William S Fulton of Arkansas Felix Grundy of Tennessee William Hendricks of Indiana Henry Hubbard of New Hampshire William R King of Alabama John P King of Georgia Lewis F Linn of Missouri Lucius Lyon of Michigan Samuel McKean of Pennsylvania Gabriel Moore of Alabama Thomas Morris of Ohio Alexandre Mouton of Louisiana Robert C Nicholas of Louisiana John M Niles of Connecticut John Norvell of Michigan John Page of New Hampshire Richard E Parker of Virginia William C Rives of Virginia John M Robinson of Illinois John Ruggles of Maine Ambrose H Sevier of Arkansas Robert Strange of North Carolina Nathaniel P Tallmadge of New York John Tipton of Indiana Robert J Walker of Mississippi Silas Wright of New York Richard H Bayard of Delaware Henry Clay of Kentucky Thomas Clayton of Delaware John J Crittenden of Kentucky John Davis of Massachusetts Thomas Ewing of Ohio Joseph Kent of Maryland Nehemiah R Knight of Rhode Island Samuel Prentiss of Vermont Asher Robbins of Rhode Island Samuel L Southard of New Jersey John Selby Spence of Maryland Benjamin Swift of Vermont Gideon Tomlinson of Connecticut Garret D Wall of New Jersey Daniel Webster of MassachusettsMembers not voting John C Calhoun of South Carolina William C Preston of South Carolina Hugh L White of TennesseeSources 11 12 Electoral college selection editMethod of choosing electors State s Each Elector appointed by state legislature South CarolinaEach Elector chosen by voters statewide all other States See also editInauguration of Martin Van Buren History of the United States 1789 1849 1836 37 United States House of Representatives elections 1836 37 United States Senate electionsReferences edit National General Election VEP Turnout Rates 1789 Present United States Election Project CQ Press Murse Tom December 16 2020 Last Time Consecutive Democratic Presidents Were Elected ThoughtCo You d have to go back even further in history to find the most recent instance of a Democrat being elected to succeed a two term president from the same party The last time that happened was in 1836 when voters elected Martin Van Buren to follow Andrew Jackson Cole Donald B 1984 Martin Van Buren and the American Political System Princeton NJ Princeton University Press p 279 ISBN 0 691 04715 4 Retrieved March 23 2017 a b c National Party Conventions 1831 1976 Congressional Quarterly 1979 a b c d e Deskins Donald Richard Walton Hanes Puckett Sherman 2010 Presidential Elections 1789 2008 County State and National Mapping of Election Data University of Michigan Press pp 106 107 United States Congress 1837 Senate Journal 24th Congress 2nd Session February 4 pp 203 204 Archived from the original on April 4 2015 Retrieved August 20 2006 Murse Tom December 16 2020 Last Time Consecutive Democratic Presidents Were Elected ThoughtCo Archived from the original on June 3 2021 Retrieved July 6 2021 Burke Window To The Past Norton Mary Beth 2015 A People and a Nation A History of the United States 10th ed Wadsworth Publishing p 344 The Senate Elects a Vice President Washington D C Office of the Secretary of the Senate Retrieved August 11 2019 Cong Globe 24th Cong 2nd Sess 166 1837 A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation U S Congressional Documents and Debates 1774 1875 Washington D C Library of Congress Retrieved August 8 2019 24th Congress Senate Vote 334 1837 voteview com Los Angeles California UCLA Department of Political Science and Social Science Computing Retrieved August 8 2019 Further reading editFurther information Martin Van Buren Further reading and Bibliography of Martin Van Buren Brown Thomas The miscegenation of Richard Mentor Johnson as an issue in the national election campaign of 1835 1836 Civil War History 39 1 1993 5 30 online Cheathem Mark R The Coming of Democracy Presidential Campaigning in the Age of Jackson Johns Hopkins University Press 2018 Ershkowitz Herbert B The Election of 1836 in American Presidential Campaigns and Elections Routledge 2020 pp 270 288 Hoffmann William S The Election of 1836 in North Carolina North Carolina Historical Review 32 1 1955 31 51 online McCormick Richard P Was There a Whig Strategy in 1836 Journal of the Early Republic 4 1 1984 47 70 online Shade William G The Most Delicate and Exciting Topics Martin Van Buren Slavery and the Election of 1836 Journal of the Early Republic 18 3 1998 459 484 online Silbey Joel H Election of 1836 in Arthur M Schlesinger Jr and Fred L Israel eds History of American Presidential Elections 4 vols 1971 I 577 64 history plus primary sources Towers Frank The Rise of the Whig Party in A Companion to the Era of Andrew Jackson 2013 328 347 External links edit A Historical Analysis of the Electoral College The Green Papers Retrieved March 20 2005 Presidential Election of 1836 A Resource Guide from the Library of Congress Election of 1836 in Counting the Votes Archived March 4 2016 at the Wayback Machine nbsp Wikimedia Commons has media related to United States presidential election 1836 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title 1836 United States presidential election amp oldid 1204571076, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.